search for: islcodegener

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "islcodegener".

Did you mean: islcodegen
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote: > Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory > test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test > cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally. I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can disable all the CodeGen directory (and subdirectories) when Cloog is not available. Note that
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > ... >> Does attached patch work for you? >> >> Tobi >> > > Tobi, > Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test' > without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Thanks for
2012 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012, at 06:01 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > Sebastian Pop wrote: > > Sebastian Pop wrote: > > > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to > > > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl. > > > > I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test > >
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: ... > Does attached patch work for you? > > Tobi > Tobi, Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test' without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? Failing Tests (5):
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Tobias Grosser wrote: >> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory >> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test >> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally. > > I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can > disable all the
2012 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Sebastian Pop wrote: > > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to > > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl. > > I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test > dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing > another patch
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> ... >>> Does attached patch work for you? >>> >>> Tobi >>> >> >> Tobi, >> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > >Tobias Grosser wrote: > >>Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory > >>test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test > >>cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally. > > > >I only know how to disable the test of a full
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2012 Oct 21
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 03:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> ... >>>> Does attached patch work for you? >>>> >>>> Tobi >>>> >>> >>> Tobi,
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 07:42 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: >>> Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory >>>> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test >>>> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
2012 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl. I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing another patch that will adapt most of the current tests to work with