Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "islcodegener".
Did you mean:
islcodegen
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:
> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can
disable all the CodeGen directory (and subdirectories) when Cloog is not
available. Note that
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> ...
>> Does attached patch work for you?
>>
>> Tobi
>>
>
> Tobi,
> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test'
> without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly.
Thanks for
2012 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012, at 06:01 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Hi Tobi,
>
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to
> > > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl.
> >
> > I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test
> >
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
...
> Does attached patch work for you?
>
> Tobi
>
Tobi,
Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test'
without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly.
Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11?
Failing Tests (5):
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
>> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
>> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
>
> I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can
> disable all the
2012 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi,
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to
> > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl.
>
> I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test
> dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing
> another patch
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> ...
>>> Does attached patch work for you?
>>>
>>> Tobi
>>>
>>
>> Tobi,
>> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >Tobias Grosser wrote:
> >>Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
> >>test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
> >>cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
> >
> >I only know how to disable the test of a full
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2012 Oct 21
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 03:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> Does attached patch work for you?
>>>>
>>>> Tobi
>>>>
>>>
>>> Tobi,
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 07:42 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>>> Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
>>>> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
>>>> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
2012 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi,
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to
> write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl.
I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test
dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing
another patch that will adapt most of the current tests to work with