Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "isinputtrustworthy".
2016 Mar 22
2
Need help with code generation
...tic that lld itself would consider
> crash-on-invalid "not a bug" to the point of not reviewing/approving
> patches to fix such issues. That's what I'm concerned about in this thread.
>
That's one way to see that. The other view is it as a whole has a boolean
option *IsInputTrustworthy* and works accordingly. What matters most is
what we provide to the users as a guarantee. You have an opinion that that
should be implemented within LLD, but that would now an internal design
choice. Hypothetically we had such pass to verify inputs, and if you send a
patch to "fix" crash...
2016 Mar 22
4
Need help with code generation
...ash-on-invalid "not a bug" to the point of not reviewing/approving
>>> patches to fix such issues. That's what I'm concerned about in this thread.
>>>
>>
>> That's one way to see that. The other view is it as a whole has a boolean
>> option *IsInputTrustworthy* and works accordingly. What matters most is
>> what we provide to the users as a guarantee. You have an opinion that that
>> should be implemented within LLD, but that would now an internal design
>> choice. Hypothetically we had such pass to verify inputs, and if you send a
>...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...consider
>> crash-on-invalid "not a bug" to the point of not reviewing/approving
>> patches to fix such issues. That's what I'm concerned about in this thread.
>>
>
> That's one way to see that. The other view is it as a whole has a boolean
> option *IsInputTrustworthy* and works accordingly. What matters most is
> what we provide to the users as a guarantee. You have an opinion that that
> should be implemented within LLD, but that would now an internal design
> choice. Hypothetically we had such pass to verify inputs, and if you send a
> patch to &...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...proving
> > > > patches to fix such issues. That's what I'm concerned about in
> > > > this
> > > > thread.
> > >
> >
>
> > > That's one way to see that. The other view is it as a whole has a
> > > boolean option IsInputTrustworthy and works accordingly. What
> > > matters most is what we provide to the users as a guarantee. You
> > > have an opinion that that should be implemented within LLD, but
> > > that
> > > would now an internal design choice. Hypothetically we had such
> > >...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
...;not a bug" to the point of not reviewing/approving
>>>> patches to fix such issues. That's what I'm concerned about in this thread.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's one way to see that. The other view is it as a whole has a
>>> boolean option *IsInputTrustworthy* and works accordingly. What matters
>>> most is what we provide to the users as a guarantee. You have an opinion
>>> that that should be implemented within LLD, but that would now an internal
>>> design choice. Hypothetically we had such pass to verify inputs, and if yo...
2016 Mar 23
3
Need help with code generation
...the point of not reviewing/approving
>>>>> patches to fix such issues. That's what I'm concerned about in this thread.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's one way to see that. The other view is it as a whole has a
>>>> boolean option *IsInputTrustworthy* and works accordingly. What
>>>> matters most is what we provide to the users as a guarantee. You have an
>>>> opinion that that should be implemented within LLD, but that would now an
>>>> internal design choice. Hypothetically we had such pass to verify input...
2016 Mar 22
0
Need help with code generation
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a question. If there is a ELF verifier function that walks every
>> part of an ELF file to verify that the file is sane, and if you can call
>> that before calling LLD's function, are you guys happy
2016 Mar 23
0
Need help with code generation
...iewing/approving
>>>>>> patches to fix such issues. That's what I'm concerned about in this thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's one way to see that. The other view is it as a whole has a
>>>>> boolean option *IsInputTrustworthy* and works accordingly. What
>>>>> matters most is what we provide to the users as a guarantee. You have an
>>>>> opinion that that should be implemented within LLD, but that would now an
>>>>> internal design choice. Hypothetically we had such pass to...
2016 Mar 22
4
Need help with code generation
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> I have a question. If there is a ELF verifier function that walks every
> part of an ELF file to verify that the file is sane, and if you can call
> that before calling LLD's function, are you guys happy with that?
>
I'd like to get you guys opinion on this question.
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at