search for: isinlineasm

I'm getting this error in RegAllocFast.cpp in compiling one source file in test-suite as the result of a new Mips fast-isel patch I was testing. It apparently just generates bad code and continues? // Nothing we can do. Report an error and keep going with a bad allocation. if (MI->isInlineAsm()) MI->emitError("inline assembly requires more registers than available"); else MI->emitError("ran out of registers during register allocation"); How is it possible to run out of registers during register allocation? Lol. Reed

...rce >> file in test-suite as the result of a new Mips fast-isel patch >> I was testing. >> >> It apparently just generates bad code and continues? >> >> // Nothing we can do. Report an error and keep going with a bad >> allocation. >> if (MI->isInlineAsm()) >> MI->emitError("inline assembly requires more registers than >> available"); >> else >> MI->emitError("ran out of registers during register allocation"); >> >> >> How is it possible to run out of registers during re...

...ister(DefReg)) return false; // Avoid instructions obviously unsafe for remat. if (MI.isNotDuplicable() || MI.mayStore() || MI.hasUnmodeledSideEffects()) return false; // Don't remat inline asm. We have no idea how expensive it is // even if it's side effect free. if (MI.isInlineAsm()) return false; } We have following doubts and require guidance and suggestion to move ahead: 1. Is the approach we are following feasible? 2. What will be the suitable method to store the sequence of instruction for recomputing value which will be used during transformation. 3. Suggestion fo...

Hello, I am working on backend development and would like to utilize my target's MCAsmParser inside of an MCInst-level class implementation. I noticed that the AsmParser is registered with the target registry however I am having no luck grepping for a "template" of how to instantiate it and have yet to find specific documentation on how it is done. Any ideas or help is greatly

Forgive me if these questions are naive or if I'm misunderstanding something. I'm certainly very interested in seeing the MachineCopyPropagation patch finally land and stick. 1. Wouldn't function live-ins and reserved registers have started life as physical registers already? For example, wouldn't a live-in be a copy from a physical register to a virtual one allowing the flag to

...ary(MI, MBB, MF)) >> - return true; >> - >> - return false; >> -} >> - >> -// isSoloInstruction - return true if instruction I must end previous >> -// packet. >> -bool VLIWPacketizerList::isSoloInstruction(MachineInstr *I) { >> - if (I->isInlineAsm()) >> - return true; >> - >> - return false; >> -} >> + if (VLIWScheduler) >> + delete VLIWScheduler; >> >> -// addToPacket - Add I to the current packet and reserve resource. >> -void VLIWPacketizerList::addToPacket(MachineInstr *MI) {...