search for: isemann

...e to pay for it directly and give folks outside Google access, but that is unfortunately a hard problem for a variety of reasons). I'd be happy to help to provide a DB snapshot for the migration, of course. 2. We switch to github PRs Thoughts? /Manuel On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: > Friendly ping > > Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea > <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: > > > > cc Paul / MyDeveloperDay > > > > > > > > De : llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists...

cc Paul / MyDeveloperDay De : llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> De la part de David Blaikie via llvm-dev Envoyé : April 8, 2020 10:21 PM À : Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com>; Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> Cc : llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Objet : Re: [llvm-dev] Outdated Phabricator version on reviews.llvm.org breaks Google authentication since today hey Manuel - are you/do you know who's likely to be doing...

...hat is unfortunately a hard problem for a variety of reasons). I'd be happy to help to provide a DB snapshot for the migration, of course. >> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >> >> Thoughts? >> /Manuel >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Friendly ping >>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: >>> > >>> > cc Paul / MyDeveloperDay >>> > >&...

...o help to provide a DB snapshot for the >> migration, of course. >> >> >> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> /Manuel >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Friendly ping >> >>> >> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >> >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: >> >>> > &gt...

...o help to provide a DB snapshot for the >> migration, of course. >> >> >> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> /Manuel >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Friendly ping >> >>> >> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >> >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: >> >>> > &gt...

...ourse. >>>> >> >>>> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>> >> >>>> >> Thoughts? >>>> >> /Manuel >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>> >>> <alexandre.ganea at...

...ourse. >>>> >> >>>> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>> >> >>>> >> Thoughts? >>>> >> /Manuel >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>> >>> <alexandre.ganea at...

...; >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thoughts? >>>>>> >> /Manuel >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>>>> >>>...

...file: > This tool lets us build LLVM components within the tree by setting up a > $GOPATH that resembles a tree fetched in the normal way with "go get". (FWIW, I had the exact same reaction as you, before realizing the above.) On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 2:46 AM Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So just to summarise what happened outside the mailing list: > * We removed llvm-go > * We also removed/fixed several things that referenced llvm-go in the > following days. > * We reverted all of that (apparently to test LLV...

...;>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> Thoughts? >> >>>>>> >> /Manuel >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < >> teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexand...

Hi all, I’m using my Google account to log into my Phabricator account on reviews.llvm.org . Since today that no longer works as I don’t seem to get any reply from reviews.llvm.org when I’m logged into my account. It tried logging out which fixes the issue of reviews.llvm.org not loading, but when I try to login I just get the following error: > Expected to retrieve an "account"

...> 2. We switch to github PRs > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Thoughts? > >>>>> >> /Manuel > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < > teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> Friendly ping > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea > >>>>> &...

...nents within the tree by setting up a > $GOPATH that resembles a tree fetched in the normal way with "go get". > > > > > > (FWIW, I had the exact same reaction as you, before realizing the above.) > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 2:46 AM Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> So just to summarise what happened outside the mailing list: > >> * We removed llvm-go > >> * We also removed/fixed several things that referenced llvm-go in the > following days. > >&...

...xplain why it's worth adding back in. On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:17 AM Jonas Devlieghere via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up! Strong +1 from me for all the reasons > you've mentioned. > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:42 AM Raphael Isemann via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > the monorepo contains a Go frontend called 'llgo' (in the llgo/ top > > level folder). It apparently hasn't been active since 2017 and before > > that it wasn't ve...

...llvm-dev < >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for bringing this up! Strong +1 from me for all the reasons >>>>> you've mentioned. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:42 AM Raphael Isemann via llvm-dev >>>>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi all, >>>>> > >>>>> > the monorepo contains a Go frontend called 'llgo' (in the llgo/ top >>>>> > level fol...

...> >>>>> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thoughts? >>>>> >> /Manuel >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com<mailto:teemperor at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>>...

...t;> >>> >>>>>> >> Thoughts? >>> >>>>>> >> /Manuel >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < >>> teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04...

..., Feb 10, 2020 at 9:17 AM Jonas Devlieghere via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for bringing this up! Strong +1 from me for all the reasons >>> you've mentioned. >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:42 AM Raphael Isemann via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > the monorepo contains a Go frontend called 'llgo' (in the llgo/ top >>> > level folder). It apparently hasn't been active since...

Hi all, the monorepo contains a Go frontend called 'llgo' (in the llgo/ top level folder). It apparently hasn't been active since 2017 and before that it wasn't very active either (there were 13 commits in 2016 apparently, most of it minor fixes). I would propose that we remove it from the monorepo for the following reasons: * It is apparently unmaintained. * It only supports a

...; >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thoughts? >>>>>> >> /Manuel >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com<mailto:teemperor at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea...