Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "isdirective".
Did you mean:
directive
2010 May 07
2
[LLVMdev] MCStreamer interface
...y change was to deal with COMDAT's. I had dealt with the characteristics flags in the object writer, but I like this. If you don't mind I would like to merge my changes into this patch and submit it. I was just pondering how to deal with the PrintSwitchToSection function without needing the IsDirective flag.
I prefer to merge in small independent patches as they are built. Please review Peter's patch (since you know COFF :). I'll take a look tomorrow and apply it if you think it is forward progress, and if there aren't other issues.
Thanks!
-Chris
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010...
2010 May 07
0
[LLVMdev] MCStreamer interface
...y change
was to deal with COMDAT's. I had dealt with the characteristics flags in the
object writer, but I like this. If you don't mind I would like to merge my
changes into this patch and submit it. I was just pondering how to deal with
the PrintSwitchToSection function without needing the IsDirective flag.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Peter S. Housel <housel at acm.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 13:22 -0700, Nathan Jeffords wrote:
>
> >
> > The important point here is that the COFF MCSection needs to
> > have the right level of semantic i...
2010 May 07
0
[LLVMdev] MCStreamer interface
...deal with COMDAT's. I had dealt with the characteristics flags in the
> object writer, but I like this. If you don't mind I would like to merge my
> changes into this patch and submit it. I was just pondering how to deal with
> the PrintSwitchToSection function without needing the IsDirective flag.
>
>
> I prefer to merge in small independent patches as they are built. Please
> review Peter's patch (since you know COFF :). I'll take a look tomorrow and
> apply it if you think it is forward progress, and if there aren't other
> issues.
>
> Thanks!
&g...
2010 May 07
3
[LLVMdev] MCStreamer interface
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 13:22 -0700, Nathan Jeffords wrote:
>
> The important point here is that the COFF MCSection needs to
> have the right level of semantic information. In fact,
> MCSection is the place that I'd start for COFF bringup.
>
> OK, I see that now. The current isolation
> between TargetLoweringObjectFile ->
2010 May 07
1
[LLVMdev] MCStreamer interface
...OMDAT's. I had dealt with the characteristics flags in the
>> object writer, but I like this. If you don't mind I would like to merge my
>> changes into this patch and submit it. I was just pondering how to deal with
>> the PrintSwitchToSection function without needing the IsDirective flag.
>>
>>
>> I prefer to merge in small independent patches as they are built. Please
>> review Peter's patch (since you know COFF :). I'll take a look tomorrow and
>> apply it if you think it is forward progress, and if there aren't other
>> issu...