Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "isbytecodearch".
2005 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] Patch to determine whether an LLVM archive file really is such
...rchive/ArchiveReader.cpp,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.38 ArchiveReader.cpp
--- lib/Bytecode/Archive/ArchiveReader.cpp 29 Dec 2004 01:20:24 -0000
1.38
+++ lib/Bytecode/Archive/ArchiveReader.cpp 26 Feb 2005 20:05:12 -0000
@@ -503,3 +503,32 @@
}
}
}
+
+bool
+Archive::isBytecodeArchive()
+{
+ //Make sure the symTab has been loaded...
+ //in most cases this should have been done
+ //when the archive was constructed, but still,
+ //this is just in case.
+ if ( !symTab.size() )
+ loadSymbolTable();
+
+ //Now that we know it's been loaded, return true
+ //if it has a...
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached