Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "isaggreg".
Did you mean:
aggreg
2019 Jul 02
2
RFC: Complex in LLVM
...tter).
> That gives us an existing set of accessors.
I agree non-vector. If nothing else a vector of complexes seems like a
sensible concept which would be harder if a complex was itself
vectorial.
Myself, I think I do favour insertvalue/extractvalue over intrinsics
(which is probably a +1 for isAggregate too by extension).
If the notation for the literal is especially re/im rather than 0/1 we
might think about adding "extractvalue %v, real" as sugar (that last
arg is already weird). All just things to think about right now
though.
Cheers.
Tim.
2019 Jul 02
2
RFC: Complex in LLVM
Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 19:56, David Greene via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> llvm.creal.* - Overloaded intrinsic to extract the real part of a
>> complex value
>> declare float @llvm.creal.c32(c32 %Val)
>> declare double @llvm.creal.c64(c64 %Val)
>
> What are