Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "is_signed".
Did you mean:
assigned
2015 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] problems building llvm-gcc-4.2 on fedora 21
...s=c,c++
--disable-multilib
when I run:
$ make
I get the following errors:
/home/draikes/src/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:346:19: error:
â EURO ~enable_ifâ EURO (tm) in namespace â EURO ~stdâ EURO (tm) does not name a template type
typename std::enable_if<std::numeric_limits<T>::is_signed, bool>::type
^
/home/draikes/src/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:346:28: error:
expected unqualified-id before â EURO ~<â EURO (tm) token
typename std::enable_if<std::numeric_limits<T>::is_signed, bool>::type
^
/home/draikes/sr...
2015 Aug 21
0
Problem with psignal.c for Windows builds
Continuing with problems that I've uncovered while getting pqR to work
on Windows...
The file src/ghuwin32/psignal.c (used only in Windows builds) fails to
use the sigset_t type in all places where it should, using "int" some
places instead.
Here is a diff of the needed corrections:
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ sighandler_t signal(int signal_Number, sighandler_t signal_Handler)
int
2014 May 19
0
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
op 19-05-14 14:30, Christian K?nig schreef:
> Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>> [SNIP]
>>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way we do reset handling from a conceptual point of view. Every IOCTL or other call chain into
2014 May 19
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef:
>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> [SNIP]
>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way we
>> do reset handling from a conceptual point of view. Every IOCTL or
>> other call chain into the driver is protected by the read side of
2014 Jul 22
2
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
op 22-07-14 15:45, Christian K?nig schreef:
> Am 22.07.2014 15:26, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:19:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
>>> Am 22.07.2014 13:57, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:46:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:43:13AM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
2014 May 19
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 15-05-14 18:13, Christian K?nig schreef:
>> Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb
2014 May 19
0
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef:
> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> op 15-05-14 18:13, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>> Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>>> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>>>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig
2014 Jul 22
0
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Hey,
op 22-07-14 17:02, Christian K?nig schreef:
> Am 22.07.2014 16:44, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> op 22-07-14 15:45, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>> Am 22.07.2014 15:26, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:19:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
>>>>> Am 22.07.2014 13:57, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22,
2014 Jul 23
0
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
op 22-07-14 17:59, Christian K?nig schreef:
> Am 22.07.2014 17:42, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Christian K?nig
>> <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>>> Drivers exporting fences need to provide a fence->signaled and a fence->wait
>>> function, everything else like fence->enable_signaling or calling
>>>
2014 Jul 22
0
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 22.07.2014 16:44, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 22-07-14 15:45, Christian K?nig schreef:
>> Am 22.07.2014 15:26, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:19:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
>>>> Am 22.07.2014 13:57, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:46:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>> On
2014 May 19
0
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
op 15-05-14 18:13, Christian K?nig schreef:
> Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>>>>> op 15-05-14 11:42, Christian K?nig
2014 May 15
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef:
>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>>> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>>>> op 15-05-14 11:42, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 11:38, schrieb
2014 Jul 23
5
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 23.07.2014 08:40, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 22-07-14 17:59, Christian K?nig schreef:
>> Am 22.07.2014 17:42, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Christian K?nig
>>> <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>>>> Drivers exporting fences need to provide a fence->signaled and a fence->wait
>>>> function,
2014 Jul 22
5
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 22.07.2014 17:42, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Christian K?nig
> <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>> Drivers exporting fences need to provide a fence->signaled and a fence->wait
>> function, everything else like fence->enable_signaling or calling
>> fence_signaled() from the driver is optional.
>>
>> Drivers
2014 May 19
2
[RFC PATCH v1 08/16] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
Am 19.05.2014 15:35, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 19-05-14 14:30, Christian K?nig schreef:
>> Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef:
>>>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>>> [SNIP]
>>>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way
>>>>
2014 Jul 22
3
[PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:19:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 22.07.2014 13:57, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:46:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:43:13AM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> >>>Am 22.07.2014 06:05, schrieb Dave Airlie:
> >>>>On 9 July 2014 22:29, Maarten Lankhorst