search for: is_interactive

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "is_interactive".

Did you mean: iminteractive
2016 Feb 16
2
[PATCH] fish: reset the console on ^Z RHBZ#1213844
Patch registers SIGTSTP hook where it sends reset terminal color control sequence. Maros Zatko (1): fish: reset the console on ^Z RHBZ#1213844 fish/fish.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) -- 2.5.0
2016 Feb 16
0
[PATCH] fish: reset the console on ^Z RHBZ#1213844
...nal (); +#endif + + /* Reset the signals. */ + sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, &oset, NULL); +} + int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { @@ -439,6 +502,15 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[]) exit (EXIT_FAILURE); } + /* Register ^Z handler. We need it to reset terminal colors + */ + if (is_interactive) { + memset (&sa, 0, sizeof sa); + sa.sa_handler = user_control_z; + sa.sa_flags = SA_RESTART; + sigaction (SIGTSTP, &sa, NULL); + } + /* Old-style -i syntax? Since -a/-d/-N and -i was disallowed * previously, if we have -i without any drives but with something * on...
2016 Mar 08
1
[PATCH] fish: reset the console on ^Z RHBZ#1213844
Patch registers SIGTSTP hook where it sends reset terminal color control sequence using write and fsync. Handler is installed only if signal is not being ignored. Patch uses rl_free_line_state and rl_cleanup_after_signal to unhook readline from terminal, then it calls original TSTP handler using approach in URL below and again hooks readline using rl_reset_after_signal. Handling is based on code
2012 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] problem trying to write an LLVM register-allocation pass
I have a new problem: Register RBP is used in a function foo. (I am not allocating RBP to any virtual register, the instances of RBP in function foo are in the machine code when my register allocator starts.) Function foo calls function bar. Register RBP is not saved across the call, though it is live after the call. Function bar includes a virtual register. The code that I'm using to
2012 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] problem trying to write an LLVM register-allocation pass
...C_plus_plus ) { if ( use_read ) { outn( "\tif ( (result = read( fileno(yyin), (char *) buf, max_size )) < 0 ) \\" ); outn( "\t\tYY_FATAL_ERROR( \"input in flex scanner failed\" );" ); } else { outn( "\tif ( yy_current_buffer->yy_is_interactive ) \\" ); outn( "\t\t{ \\" ); outn( "\t\tint c = '*', n; \\" ); outn( "\t\tfor ( n = 0; n < max_size && \\" ); outn( "\t\t\t (c = getc( yyin )) != EOF && c != '\\n'; ++n ) \\" ); outn( "\t\t\tbuf[n]...
2011 Jun 02
48
[PATCH 0/9] libxl: disk configuration handling
This is v3 of my disk series. What were previously patches 01-06 have been applied. These are the tested and updated remainder, addressing the previous comments. 1 Preparatory work. 2-4 The new parser and its documentation. 5-6 Replace old parsers with calls to the new one. 7-8 Two features, one of them essential. 9 Basic test suite for disk string parsing, as adhoc script.
2017 Jan 20
5
[PATCH 0/5] Rename src/ to lib/ and move common code to common/
This patch series moves some files and directories around but is only code motion (or supposed to be). A new directory, common/, is created for all of the common code which is currently shared in random ways between parts of the project. And src/ becomes lib/ (the largest change, but mostly mechanical). In full this series makes the following changes: src/libprotocol -> common/protocol
2017 Jan 25
10
[PATCH v2 0/7] Rename src/ to lib/ and move common code to common/
Previous patch series was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-January/msg00059.html v2 simply extends this patch series to cover the extra directories common/edit, common/progress, common/windows and common/parallel. The only remaining item is to consider whether we should rename mllib to something else, mlcommon was my suggestion. Rich.