search for: is_dirti

Greetings! I am new to kvm Libvirt and are writing a python script to get the number of pre-copy cycles during a remote vm migration given memory size M  of a VM in MB, the page dirty rate R of a vm in MB/s. My question is on how to get the page dirty rate. Does kvm libvirt provide a dirty page log facility that provides user space with a bitmap of modified pages since the last call? And if yes,

This patch introduces a hypercall implemented for X86 that can assist against subset of kernel rootkits, it works by place readonly protection in shadow PTE. The end result protection is also kept in a bitmap for each kvm_memory_slot and is used as reference when updating SPTEs. The whole goal is to protect the guest kernel static data from modification if attacker is running from guest ring 0,

This patch introduces a hypercall implemented for X86 that can assist against subset of kernel rootkits, it works by place readonly protection in shadow PTE. The end result protection is also kept in a bitmap for each kvm_memory_slot and is used as reference when updating SPTEs. The whole goal is to protect the guest kernel static data from modification if attacker is running from guest ring 0,

Here is change log from V3 To V4: - Fixing spelling/grammar mistakes suggested by Randy Dunlap - Changing the hypercall interface to be able to process multiple pages per one hypercall also suggested by Randy Dunlap. It turns out that this will save lots of vmexist/memory slot flushes when protecting many pages. [PATCH RFC V4 1/3] KVM: X86: Memory ROE documentation [PATCH RFC V4 2/3] KVM:

Hi, This is my first set of patches that works as I would expect, and the third revision I sent to mailing lists. Following up with my previous discussions about kernel rootkit mitigation via placing R/O protection on critical data structure, static data, privileged registers with static content. These patches present the first part where it is only possible to place these protections on memory

Hi, This is my first set of patches that works as I would expect, and the third revision I sent to mailing lists. Following up with my previous discussions about kernel rootkit mitigation via placing R/O protection on critical data structure, static data, privileged registers with static content. These patches present the first part where it is only possible to place these protections on memory

The KVM introspection subsystem provides a facility for applications running on the host or in a separate VM, to control the execution of other VMs (pause, resume, shutdown), query the state of the vCPUs (GPRs, MSRs etc.), alter the page access bits in the shadow page tables (only for the hardware backed ones, eg. Intel's EPT) and receive notifications when events of interest have taken place