search for: is_cow_mapping

...remy@xensource.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- mm/memory.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) =================================================================== --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ copy_one_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, s */ if (is_cow_mapping(vm_flags)) { ptep_set_wrprotect(src_mm, addr, src_pte); - pte = *src_pte; + pte = pte_wrprotect(pte); } /*

[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ] Hi Andrew, This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree. For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The patches should

[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ] Hi Andrew, This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree. For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The patches should

I''m sure everyone has seen the drop of VMI patches for Linux at this point, but just in case, the link is included below. I''ve read this version of the VMI spec and have made my way through most of the patches. While I wasn''t really that impressed with the first spec wrt Xen, the second version seems to be much more palatable. Specifically, the code inlining and