Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "is_base_and_deriv".
Did you mean:
is_base_and_derived
2007 Jul 04
1
[LLVMdev] API design (and Boost and tr1)
...class,
// the template match is preferred for classes derived from
// Value if this argument is not here. Note that if
// InputIterator IS Value *, the non-template constructor
// is a better match.
typename detail::disable_if<
is_base_and_derived<
Value,
typename remove_pointer<InputIterator>::type
>::value
>::type enabler = 0)
: Instruction(cast<FunctionType>(cast<PointerType>(Func->getType())
->getEleme...
2007 Jul 03
4
[LLVMdev] API design
On Monday 02 July 2007 16:26, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > I've been running LLVM with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG (extra checks) turned on to
> > see what would happen, and it's been a complete disaster.
Well, that's a bit harsh, isn't it? It's finding bugs, just like it's
supposed to. :)
I believe I've started to run into