Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "is26_d".
2015 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] SIMD for sdiv <2 x i64>
------------------------------------ IR
------------------------------------------------------------------
if.then.i.i.i.i.i.i: ; preds = %if.then4
%S25_D = zext <2 x i32> %splatLDS17_D.splat to <2 x i64>
%umul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D = shl <2 x i64> %S25_D, <i64 3, i64 3>
%extumul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D = extractelement <2 x i64>
%umul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D, i32 1
%call5.i.i = tail call noalias i8* @_Znam(i64
%extumul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D) #22
%splatCallS27_D.splatinsert = insertelement <2 x i8*>...
2015 Jul 24
1
[LLVMdev] SIMD for sdiv <2 x i64>
...:
> ------------------------------------ IR
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> if.then.i.i.i.i.i.i: ; preds = %if.then4
> %S25_D = zext <2 x i32> %splatLDS17_D.splat to <2 x i64>
> %umul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D = shl <2 x i64> %S25_D, <i64 3, i64 3>
> %extumul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D = extractelement <2 x i64>
> %umul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D, i32 1
> %call5.i.i = tail call noalias i8* @_Znam(i64
> %extumul_with_overflow.i.iS26_D) #22
> %splatCallS27_D.splatinsert = i...
2015 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] SIMD for sdiv <2 x i64>
On 07/24/2015 03:42 AM, Benjamin Kramer wrote:
>> On 24.07.2015, at 08:06, zhi chen <zchenhn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It seems that that it's hard to vectorize int64 in LLVM. For example, LLVM 3.4 generates very complicated code for the following IR. I am running on a Haswell processor. Is it because there is no alternative AVX/2 instructions for int64? The same thing