search for: irrevocable

I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device directly. However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance figure, I started increasing the MTU settings on the PCI-express NICs with RTL8168B chips. First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K instead of 9K but

Dear all I am trying to configure samba username map file in order to map the same user from a windows domain to 2 different unix users: Map to = map from bea = PRODUCTION\garcijo mpcadmin = PRODUCTION\garcijo but only works for the first map in the map file. When I try to use a share with permissions for mpcadmin unix user, I realize that smbd takes the first map (bea user) and

My research indicates that it is possible to run Excel 97 with standard wine using a real FAT Windows partition. So far, drawing heavily on http://www.winecentric.com/ I've been unable to get it to work. I'm running the 20020904 version, and have mutilated my wine config nearly beyond repair in an attempt to get excel to run. I've tried running all native dlls, all builtin, etc, and

[1.3.20]-Capture The Mouse Works Great. Suggestions... Hi, I've been crying for a long time about mouse issues while running a full screen game in an emulated desktop window, but with newest Wine these issues are gone. Would it be possible to have some hot key that the user can press to uncapture the mouse? For example, VirtualBox toggles mouse capture by pressing the right [Ctrl] key on

"Q. Isn't VP3 a patented technology? Yes, some portions of the VP3 codec are covered by patents. However, the Xiph.org Foundation has negotiated an irrevocable free license to the VP3 codec for any purpose imaginable on behalf of the public. It is legal to use VP3 in any way you see fit (unless, of course, you're doing something illegal with it in your particular jurisdiction). You are free to download VP3, use it free of charge, implement it in a for...

...ian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to release additional rights". To follow that guideline we should add a section like the following to Internet Drafts: x. Copying conditions The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to copy, use and distribute the work, with or without modification, in any medium, without royalty, provided that, unless separate permission is granted, redistributed modified works do not contain misleading author, version, name of work, or endorsemen...

...ian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to release additional rights". To follow that guideline we should add a section like the following to Internet Drafts: x. Copying conditions The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to copy, use and distribute the work, with or without modification, in any medium, without royalty, provided that, unless separate permission is granted, redistributed modified works do not contain misleading author, version, name of work, or endorsemen...

...ian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to release additional rights". To follow that guideline we should add a section like the following to Internet Drafts: x. Copying conditions The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to copy, use and distribute the work, with or without modification, in any medium, without royalty, provided that, unless separate permission is granted, redistributed modified works do not contain misleading author, version, name of work, or endorsemen...

Hey Xen devel team, I’ve never mailed a developer list before, but I’m worried I may have stumbled across a bad Xen/Debian packaging bug. My confidence is somewhere above “just mail -user” and below “open a bug in xen-system-amd64”. Apologies if this is the wrong usage of the list. I’ve updated to Buster, and my Xen kernel no longer boots. I believe it’s because Xen only offers versions 4.11 and

...NU GPL. (Note the distinction between filespec and implementation here.) Meanwhile, Theora.org's FAQ doesn't say anything about the state of the filespec, besides this: > Yes, some portions of the VP3 codec are covered by patents. However, the > Xiph.org Foundation has negotiated an irrevocable free license to the VP3 > codec for any purpose imaginable on behalf of the public. So my question is, is it alright to create and distribute a Theora codec which isn't based on the Theora code from Xiph.org? If VP3 code is in Theora, and VP3 is patented, does that mean that you can't w...

Hi there, this is my first posting to this list, so let me quickly introduce myself. I'm Alex and currently working on a new version of the rsync package for the eisfair Linux distribution?. I have some problems understanding the behaviour of the 'auth users' option in the rsyncd.conf file when running rsync in daemon mode. I set up a module and a secrets file. This is the behaviour

...info.org's name or trademarks. Any unauthorized use terminates the permission or license granted by voip-info.org. and later on: When you enter content into any area of this web site, unless stated otherwise, you grant voip-info.org and its affiliates a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, and display such content throughout the world in any media. The wiki is a great resource and I'm very grateful that the infrastructure for it has been provided, but I...

...ck http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to release additional rights". To follow that guideline a section like the following should be added: x. Copying conditions The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to copy, use and distribute the work, with or without modification, in any medium, without royalty, provided that, unless separate permission is granted, redistributed modified works do not contain misleading author, version, name of work, or endorsement inf...

> On Oct 19, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:25:16AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> 1) We could introduce a novel legal solution. > > Please, no. > >> 2) We could require new contributors to sign the Apache CLA. > > To me, this is the most acceptable

...statement.. > That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to > release additional rights". To follow that guideline a > section like the following should be added: > > x. Copying conditions > > The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable > right to copy, use and distribute the work, with > or without modification, in any medium, without royalty, > provided that, unless separate permission is granted, > redistributed modified works do not contain misleading > author, version, name of work...

> I have come accross a problem when trying to do a > direct_remap_area_pages() call in a backend driver that is > running in a privileged user domain. The call ends up with an > error code (-14 = -EFAULT). This in turn is caused by the > hypervisor call > HYPERVISOR_mmu_update() which returns an error code of -22 = > -EINVAL after failing in set_foreigndom due to not

I read wine-users, as I read every list I can, through the Gmane interface, running Pan against news.gmane.org -- and recently hit a new gremlin. Supposing it something wrong with my connection or my Pan settings, I asked there. Here are the question and reply : [begin forward] On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:57:51 +0000, I Beartooth wrote: > Somebody please take a glance at

...RANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copying conditions The authors agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to copy, use and distribute the work, with or without modification, in any medium, without royalty, provided that, unless separate permission is granted, redistributed modified works do not contain misleading author, version, name of work, or endorsement inf...

Thank you all for your answers. They were all useful. Il 21/11/2011 07:37, Erik de Castro Lopo ha scritto: > Giulio Paci wrote: > >> thank you for your answer. So the problem would be suboptimal >> compression due to suboptimal assumption about the input signal, right? >> What I do not understand is how the format of a FLAC format would be >> affected by supporting

Hi Samba team, I'm currently building a Samba Domaincontroller with a seperate domain joined Samba Fileserver in my environment. On my fileserver share which root directory is /srv/Share I don't use Windows ACLs, so just the default Linux permissions and Posix ACLs Let's assume that I've a group employees which should have rwx permissions to a group specific share. So I've