search for: irrespectively

Hi, I am working on linux 2.6.16.I tried to prioritize traffic using prio module but its not working well.It always maps to same class irrespective of ToS.Is it possible to fix it using filters?Anybody fixed this problem? -- Regards Archana Rajagopal _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 06:41:22PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:24:15PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> > > > > Irrespective of whether or not the device has any usable outputs, the > > modesetting helpers will try to register all the resources such as CRTCs > > and planes.

Wei, Quick question: Am I reading the code correctly, that even with per-device interrupt remap tables, that GSIs are accounted to the intremap table of the corresponding IOAPIC, presumably because the IOMMU sees interrupts generated as GSIs as coming from the IOAPIC? In that case, then we need all devices sharing the same IOAPIC must not have any vector collisions. Is that correct? -George

Is there any way to do this (test for the existence of a file) in R? In Splus (3.4) I can do unix(paste("test -r", fnm), output = F) where ``fnm'' is a character string giving the pathname of the file. This returns 0 if the file exists and 256 if it doesn't. I thought in R to do something like system(paste("test -r", fnm), intern =T) but this

<P>hi everyone,</P> <P>I know this issue has been raised many times before, i think still the problem remains. When a call is made through a Zap channel, whether it is actually made or not (irrespective of whether, engaged, busy, or actually answered), asterisk logs it in CDRs as a call made. This makes it impossible to do an accurate billing. Has anybody found a way to overcome

Hello, I have code containing conditions and loops. Hence some BB execution are determined at run time depending on condition. Now I want to count only those BB that are always executed irrespective of condition result means reachable. and their execution is evident at compile time. How to do this? Please help Thank You Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi all, Im a newbie to ferret.I have installed the act_as_ferret gem and i actually want to search for some content in the model,but per user. My model has data,user_id.So within the data column i have to serach for a word if it exists for a given user. So can i achieve that ? presently i know that it just searches the "data" column irrespective of the user given. Can someone help me

I see that the following test fails if reverse iteration of SmallPtrSet is enabled: /clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-loop-analysis.cpp/ This is because in SemaStmt.cpp we iterate SmallPtrSet and output warnings about the variables not used in the loop. Expected output: /warning: variables 'i', 'j', and 'k' used in loop condition not modified/ Output with reverse iteration:

On 07/20/2018 09:29 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Now that virtio core always needs all virtio devices to have DMA OPS, we > need to make sure that the structure it points is the right one. In the > absence of VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM flag QEMU expects GPA from guest kernel. > In such case, virtio device must use default virtio_direct_dma_ops DMA OPS > structure which transforms

On 07/20/2018 09:29 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Now that virtio core always needs all virtio devices to have DMA OPS, we > need to make sure that the structure it points is the right one. In the > absence of VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM flag QEMU expects GPA from guest kernel. > In such case, virtio device must use default virtio_direct_dma_ops DMA OPS > structure which transforms

Dear All On my network, there is a node with unknown ip address so I do not know about its range and it can be any of the range xx.xx.xx.xx . Is there any tool on my centos server to find this unknown ip address (irrespective of the range of my centos server self ip range) ? Thank you

I am trying to cast a Value* irrespective of its underlying subclass to uint64 and pass it on to a method as an argument. if (StoreInst *store_inst = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(&I)) { Value* vo = store_inst->getValueOperand(); uint64 value = /* cast vo to unsigned int 64 bit */ func(value); } How can I force

On (Mon) 14 Jul 2014 [20:50:06], Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:42:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > v3: > > - Kees Cook pointed out a weird side-effect: devices which have > > ->init() registered get their randomness added to the system each > > time they're switched in, but devices that don't have the init > > callback

On (Mon) 14 Jul 2014 [20:50:06], Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:42:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > v3: > > - Kees Cook pointed out a weird side-effect: devices which have > > ->init() registered get their randomness added to the system each > > time they're switched in, but devices that don't have the init > > callback

Hi, I am struggling to complete my installation of Samba to share files to my Samba Server. The error:The specified network name is no longer available - keeps recurring irrespective of the changes I make from online forums. Please help. Kind regards, Gerard

I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. One functionality that I think it would be nice to have would to update a given spec file with the updated dependencies. What do you think of this? Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Sorry for the silly question. I am trying to perform a simple operation on a subsample of my data loaded as data and attached: data<-read.dta(name file) attach(data) Say x=1,2 and y=4,5 I want to summarize z only if x=1 & y=4. I thought that the way to do that would be to write if((x=1) & (y=4)) summary(z) butwhen I do this the result I get is for the whole data (irrespective of

Irrespective of the IO-APIC vector sharing suppression patch just sent the logic in this function needs to iterate over all RTEs, since multiple pins within an IO-APIC may still use the same vector. This is due to the irq_2_pin[] mapping not necessarily being 1:1. Consequently we should remove the commented out code as well as the respective comments provisioned for the point in time when vector

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:13:37AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:09:05PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > > @@ -1028,6 +1036,16 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SAFE_STACK(exc_vmm_communication) > > > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > > > > >

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:13:37AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:09:05PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > > @@ -1028,6 +1036,16 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SAFE_STACK(exc_vmm_communication) > > > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > > > > >