search for: irq_timings_next_ev

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "irq_timings_next_ev".

2017 Nov 16
2
[PATCH RFC v3 3/6] sched/idle: Add a generic poll before enter real idle path
On 16/11/2017 10:12, Quan Xu wrote: > > > On 2017-11-16 06:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote: >>>> From: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz at gmail.com> >>>> >>>> Implement a generic idle poll which resembles the functionality
2017 Nov 16
2
[PATCH RFC v3 3/6] sched/idle: Add a generic poll before enter real idle path
On 16/11/2017 10:12, Quan Xu wrote: > > > On 2017-11-16 06:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote: >>>> From: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz at gmail.com> >>>> >>>> Implement a generic idle poll which resembles the functionality
2017 Nov 20
0
[PATCH RFC v3 3/6] sched/idle: Add a generic poll before enter real idle path
...sion. >> >> interesting. I have tested with IRQ_TIMINGS related code, which seems >> not working so far. > I don't know how you tested it, can you elaborate what you meant by > "seems not working so far" ? Daniel, I tried to enable IRQ_TIMINGS* manually. used irq_timings_next_event() to return estimation of the earliest interrupt. However I got a constant. > There are still some work to do to be more efficient. The prediction > based on the irq timings is all right if the interrupts have a simple > periodicity. But as soon as there is a pattern, the current code...