search for: irfiles

On 19 September 2014 15:54, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote: > Yes, we don’t need to edit the assembly in the file, but we need to modified the CHECK line to reflect the output of current llvm-dis. I was talking about updating the CHECK in all the previous version. Does that make sense? Yes, the CHECK lines would have to be updated, but that seems like a pretty small annoyance.

Hello everyone, ...I should have used a different subject line in the first place... I've asked Rafael a question about GlobalAlias handling in LTOModule::parseSymbols, but he seems to be on vacation... Does anyone knows the answer? Thanks a lot! Sergei --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation > -----Original

Compiled the 3.0.0 version of the source code , then tried lli --use-mcjit irfile.txt On both windows and linux, I got: LLVM ERROR: Unknow object format. If I omit the -use-mcjit option, the command works well. It seems to me that something about MCJIT is broken in the 3.0.0 version. Also tried to initialize an ExecutionEngine from code, got errors like "Target does not support MC

...*DirName, const char* BaseName, bool KeepFile) + : Fname(BaseName), Fpath(DirName), Keep(KeepFile) { + Fpath = Fpath + "/" + BaseName; + Keep = true; +} + +IPOFile::~IPOFile() { + if (Keep) + sys::fs::remove(Fpath); +} + +IPOFileMgr::IPOFileMgr(): WorkDir("llvmipo") { + IRFiles.reserve(20); + ObjFiles.reserve(20); + OtherFiles.reserve(8); + KeepFiles = true; + WorkDirCreated = false; +} + +IPOFileMgr::~IPOFileMgr() { + if (!KeepFiles) { + uint32_t NumRm; + sys::fs::remove_all(Twine(WorkDir), NumRm); + } +} + +bool IPOFileMgr::CreateWorkDir(std::string &Err...

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

Hello Sean and Tobias, Sean, Thank you. Could you describe Nick's ideas in few words or give me links to your discussion, so I could adapt my ideas to it. Tobias, Your patch fails on several modules in my benchmark (73 of ~1800 tests). I have sent one as attachment. See statistics files for more details, all the .ll files you could simply find in test-suite object directory (after