search for: ired

I mentioned this 1 or 2 years back but it's still not fixed. I presume it's a Icecast2 server problem. I'm using the latest Oddcast client, and my server host Mediacast1 has just updated to the latest Icecast2. I'm currently streaming a track in Vorbis format called: M?ire Brennan - I L?thair D? It shows this correctly in Winamp on the broadcast PC. On the Icecast Status page,

Author: kcpoon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 58254c0740547f867826e8149620a26d16242ee7 Log message: 6292054 Zero sctp_rtt_updates should mean no update to IRE RTT cache Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/sctp/sctp_common.c update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/sctp/sctp_impl.h

well, if I manually update the metadata via oddcast and enter "M? ire Brennan - I L??thair D??", then check the icecast2 status page, I see : Current Song: M?ire Brennan - I L?thair D? which I presume is correct. If I then open this stream with winamp, it displays as : M - I L?thair D?. If I look at the file properties, the vorbis winamp plugin tells me there are two comment

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- V1 had a nasty bug breaking gpu lockup recovery. The fix is not allowing radeon_fence_driver_check_lockup to take exclusive_lock, and kill it during lockup recovery instead. --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 5 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c |

Dear Ruser, Below, the deal (you can copy paste): r=3 ; set.seed(1) v <- matrix(c(rnorm(40)),10,4) for (j in 1:4){ for (i in 1:r){ x <- t(v[,j]^(i)*v[,1:4]^((r-(4-1)):r)) print(x) } } How to reach to " x " " row bind " inside or outside (preferred) of the loop. To obtain at the end something like: > x matrix( , 12*4, 10) Any help or

Am 31.07.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> > --- > V1 had a nasty bug breaking gpu lockup recovery. The fix is not > allowing radeon_fence_driver_check_lockup to take exclusive_lock, > and kill it during lockup recovery instead. That looks like the delayed work starts running as soon as we submit a

General problem: I have 20 projects that can be invested in and I need to decide which combinations meet a certain set of standards. The total possible combinations comes out to 2^20. However I know for a fact that the number of projects must be greater than 5 and less than 13. So far the the code below is the best I can come up with for iteratively creating a set to check against my set of

R 2.6.0 Windows XP At the risk of raising the ire of the R gods . . . I am looking for a package that will allow me to perform a poisson, quasipoisson, or negative binomial regression with adjustment for repeated measures. I have looked at glm, it does not appear to allow repeated measures. Although I can't get any help for lme or lme4 I remember that those packages perform repeated measures

I previously <https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/u07o3QREVUg/> proposed contributing Bazel build files to the LLVM monorepo, supported *only* by interested community members and not to interfere with or affect the existing CMake configuration. As part of that conversation, it became clear that the LLVM policies for more "peripheral" components were not clearly documented. We

Dear All, I carry out negative binomial estimations using the glm.nb command from the MASS package. Is there a command or a simple procedure for computing marginal effects from a glm.nb fitted object? If these are the same as for a Poisson fitted object (glm), my question remains how to compute them. Thanks in advance for your help. Roberto Patuelli ******************** Roberto Patuelli, Ph.D.

Dear All, I would like to analyse the residuals from a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) that I estimated, with random effects, by means of the command glmmPQL, from the MASS package. It is not very clear to me what the actual residuals to analyse are (Y - Yhat): I obtain two columns of residuals, of which the first are population residuals, and the second refer to the grouping used in the

Greetings all, I've done some ANOVAs and have found significant effects across my groups, so now I have to do some post-hoc tests to ascertain which of the groups is driving the significant effect. Usually one would do something like a Newman-Keuls or Scheffe test to get at this but based on googling and browsing through the r-help archives R doesn't support these and they seem to be

Dear All, I've been using already for a year glm.nb() from the MASS package. But today, R gave me an error message when estimating one of my usual models: > depEsf.nb <- glm.nb(depE ~ manuf00E + corps00E + lngdp00E + lngdp00sqE + > lnpop00E + indshE + scishE + mechshE + elecshE + chemshE + drugshE + > urban_dummyE + aggl_dummyE + + eE1 + eE2 + eE3 + eE4 + eE5 + eE6 + eE7 +

Dear ALL, I'm trying to figure out what the percentage effects are in a logistic regression. To be more clear, I'm not interested in the effect on y of a 1-unit increase in x, but on the percentage effect on y of a 1% increase in x (in economics this is also often called an "elasticity"). For example, if my independent variables are in logs, the betas can be directly

Hello everyone I had samba 4.1 working as a member server to a windows 2012 AD in a test environment for a while now until I had to re-install the windows server from scratch. I have the new AD setup with the same NETBIOS name but now I have problems re-joining the samba box to the new AD. It looks like a DNS issue but I am unable to understand why. After the ire-install, I got a new Kerberos

Hello I have two DSL modems witch are connected to my isp, in future my boss want to buy another connection via DSL modem. Then i will have 3 DSL modems. With every DSL modem i get 3x8 IP`s (netmask 248) from my ISP, now i have question how to configure gateway wich tools should i use. Because ip route and next hop via. wich i use now makes his work fine but with new kernels there is an error

On 11/16/20 10:01 PM, Geoffrey Martin-Noble via llvm-dev wrote: > I previously <https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/u07o3QREVUg/ > > proposed contributing Bazel build files to the LLVM monorepo, > supported *only* by interested community members and not to interfere > with or affect the existing CMake configuration. As part of that > conversation, it became clear that

Hi everybody, I'm trying to construct contrasts for an ANOVA to determine if there is a significant trend in the means of my groups. In the following example, based on the type of 2x3 ANOVA I'm trying to perform, does the linear polynomial contrast generated by contr.poly allow me to test for a linear trend across groups? doi=data.frame( Group=c( rep(1, 5), rep(2, 5), rep(3, 5),

Dear All, I'm trying to use waldtest to test poolability (parameter stability) between two logistic regressions. Because I need to use robust standard errors (using sandwich), I cannot use anova. anova has no problems running the test, but waldtest does, indipendently of specifying vcov or not. waldtest does not appear to see that my models are nested. H0 in my case is the the vector of

...l time? My configuration: Usernames: from MySQL Passwords: from Active Directory dovecot -n # 1.1.20: /etc/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-274.7.1.el5 i686 CentOS release 5.7 (Final) ext3 log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log protocols: pop3 pop3s imap imaps listen: * ssl_cert_file: /etc/pki/tls/certs/iRedMail_CA.pem ssl_key_file: /etc/pki/tls/private/iRedMail.key login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login mail_uid: 500 mail_gid: 500 mail_lo...