search for: ipxe's

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE development to iPXE. -- -Gene

...0-rc2/xen-4.2.0-rc2.tar.gz and tried to build it on Fedora 17 x86_64 host (gcc 4.7.0): make tools: .. make[5]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-4.2.0-rc2/tools/firmware'' make -C etherboot all make[6]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-4.2.0-rc2/tools/firmware/etherboot'' make -C ipxe/src bin/rtl8139.rom make[7]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-4.2.0-rc2/tools/firmware/etherboot/ipxe/src'' [BUILD] bin/isa.o drivers/bus/isa.c: In function ''isabus_probe'': drivers/bus/isa.c:112:18: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds] cc1...

The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to integrate with iPXE themselves. What do people think? -hpa

Hi All, The ipxe git commit version changed, but its release version should still stay at v1.0.0 Signed-off-by: Yongjie Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com<mailto:yongjie.ren@intel.com>> ------ diff -r 4086e4811547 tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile --- a/tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile Thu Jan 05 17:25:23 20...

I have an issue to boot iPXE with Syslinux 5.01. However, the same method works for Syslinux 4.06. The error messages I got is (see attached png file): =================================== iPXE 1.0.0+git-20120202.f8840ba-3 -- Open Source Network Boot Firmware -- http://ipxe.org Features: VLAN HTTP iSCSI DNS TFTP AoE SRP BzImage...

I've searched the forums for AMD64 and IPX but couldn't find a solution here. I am running Debian Lenny 2.6.26-1-amd64 on an AMD Turion 64x2 1.60GHz system with 1GB of RAM. I have Wine running and it runs my older games just fine (this is a laptop with an ATI1100M so no new games here!) but it doesn't seem to work with IPX. I installed the IPX tools package and ran the commands

.... The work-around of using HTTP works beautifully though. So it was time for the next step. Migrate this setup to our automated testing environment that runs under qemu-kvm. For this I had to use OVMF so the nodes would boot in EFI mode (or should I say "UEFI mode" ?). This setup uses ipxe roms to boot over the network. The short story is that I never got further than syslinux proclaiming "Failed to read blocks: 0xC" before even getting to the stage where it tries to load ldlinux.e64. Searching for answers I found a thread on the qemu-devel list discussing this problem...

I can't seem to get IPX going in Starcraft. It gives me "Unable to initialize network provider" in a pretty dialog box (as per usual). I have IPX in kernel, the interface configured for 802.2 frame type, and some IPX RIP/SAP daemon going. The kernel's IPX is configured without the "Full internal IPX network" thing. Apparently (from my reading) this would be a bad

...at 10:00 AM, Michael Brown <mbrown at fensystems.co.uk> wrote: > On 09/10/13 10:45, Robin Smidsr?d wrote: >> >> On 09.10.2013 02:56, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>> The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either >>> replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to >>> integrate with iPXE themselves. >>> >>> What do people think? >> >> >> I'm actually more of a fan of adding docs which explain how to integrate >> themselves, to avoid the ipxe checkout ins...

I would like to add my case for a wish of IPX support in Samba: We use a number of CNC tool machines whose host is pure DOS based. Don't be surprised that DOS is stilll running somewhere. It is fairly OK when we get to the field of HW and real-time control, unlike Windows and the like... These hosts use IPX to access LAN shares. IPX is here preferable to TCP/IP because of its lower memory

...in dhcpd.conf: > > if option architecture-type = 00:09 { > filename "efi64/syslinux-87020-or.efi"; > option pxelinux.pathprefix "http://bla/efi64/"; > } elsif option > architecture-type = 00:07 { > filename "efi64/ipxe-git87981.efi"; > } else { > filename "pxelinux.0"; > } > <<< > > I "think" in this case ipxe.efi probably "did not" chainload to pxelinux.efi > > When your HP booted arch=07 retrieved ipxe.efi > ipxe.efi performs...

On 25/10/15 01:04, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >> Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 > > A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some > understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further > development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE > development to iPXE. From my persp...

...Jul 16, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Alexandre Blanchette > <blanalex at gmail.com> wrote: > > In PXELinux 4.06 (the vanilla version, not gpxelinux.0), I'm trying to > use > > pxechn.c32 to call iPXE (undionly) with option 67 set to call an iPXE > > script. > > > > The relevant portion of my PXELinux config looks like this: > > > > LABEL MDT > > MENU LABEL ^B - MDT 2012 SP1 > > com32 pxechn.c32 > > APPEND undionly.kpxe -o 67.s=ipxe/mdt.ipx...

Hi all, I currently use iPXE to load memdisk and, subsequently, a FreeBSD disk image to perform an OS installation to disk. This works great in BIOS, but upcoming requirements make UEFI a prerequisite. Because memdisk is not UEFI-aware, new UEFI-aware media is necessary. The current plan is to integrate the installation scr...

In PXELinux 4.06 (the vanilla version, not gpxelinux.0), I'm trying to use pxechn.c32 to call iPXE (undionly) with option 67 set to call an iPXE script. The relevant portion of my PXELinux config looks like this: LABEL MDT MENU LABEL ^B - MDT 2012 SP1 com32 pxechn.c32 APPEND undionly.kpxe -o 67.s=ipxe/mdt.ipxe However iPXE doesn't seem to get the option correctly, it goes into aut...

On 31-07-15 18:45, Patrick Masotta wrote: >>>> > Is this possible? Are you saying the FW is stealing the DHCP response > away before iPXE gets it? I haven't thought of this possibility. > > Or am I misunderstanding you? > <<< > > I'm saying that "probably" iPXE is trigerring a new PXE sequence with a different arch but > the one that finally loads the new NBP is really the FW. My assum...

I followed the entire Starcraft/WinE HOWTO located at http://koti.mbnet.fi/~hoppq/sc-howto.html Starcraft now works just fine, except the Local Area (IPX) part doesn't work. My interface (eth0) is configured as follows: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:82:F7:A7 inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 IPX/Ethernet 802.3

On 15 Nov 2014 05:06:52 +0200, Ady wrote: > > I would start by updating the BIOS. Prudent advice. As it turns out, I'm already at the latest version. On 15 Nov 2014 07:31:27 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > And would reduce 'iPXE => pxe.0 => lpxelinux.0 => "vmlinux"' > into 'iPXE => "vmlinux"' That makes sense generally, but at the moment doesn't make sense for my particular circumstance. I should clarify: I do not seek a workaround that eliminates iPXE or eliminates lp...

...1 Jul 2015, Oscar Roozen via Syslinux wrote: > So it was time for the next step. Migrate this setup to our automated testing > environment that runs under qemu-kvm. For this I had to use OVMF so the nodes > would boot in EFI mode (or should I say "UEFI mode" ?). This setup uses ipxe > roms to boot over the network. > > The short story is that I never got further than syslinux proclaiming "Failed > to read blocks: 0xC" before even getting to the stage where it tries to load > ldlinux.e64. Searching for answers I found a thread on the qemu-devel list...

Whoops, apologies. The intent was to send this email to ipxe-devel. I'll repost to that list. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Shao Miller <ipxe at sha0.net> wrote: > On 1/23/2017 09:17, Rick Miller via Syslinux wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I currently use iPXE to load memdisk and, subsequently, a FreeBSD disk >> imag...