search for: ipvsadm

Hello all, I have ipvsadm-1.24 installed, and there's an error when the service starts: Applying IPVS configuration: /etc/init.d/ipvsadm: line 62: /etc/sysconfig/ipvsadm: No such file or directory is the install broken? I did a "yum whatprovides ipvsadm" and it does say there's a config, but doesn't...

Hi Anyone know of there is an rpm available for this? Trying to build a loadbalancer from the LVS project for a webserver farm and struggling with ipvsadm <http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm> on 4.2 thanks

hello, all! if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ? tks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>

Hi All, Using CentOS 4.4 with ipvsadm-1.24-6. I am using LVS/ipvsadm to load balance webservers, with about 20 VIP's in use. My problem is that when I start the pulse service, all of the interfaces seem to appear correctly in the output of ipvsadm -ln , but it is not possible to connect to them. I discovered that the ones I _...

...d a load balancer using lvs (with direct routing). </font><font color="#000000">I use LVS with a heartbeat configuration and ldirectord and I don't use<br> persistent connections.</font><font color="#000000">My problem is when i am running "ipvsadm -lcn", I can see a lot of connections with the CLOSE (or others states)<br> state going from 00:59 to 00:01, and then going back to 00:59. In other words these connections should be dropped after they timed out but the counter is<br> reseted to 60. I wanted to compare these entries...

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0979 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0979.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 71290c9b0f3e950fdf9377c37aeefda3 ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.i386.rpm Source: 4c7142a86b63fd934214f3c570ed13d9 ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0979 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0979.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: d9a11bd215a3b5e272eef82836ea2c8f ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 4c7142a86b63fd934214f3c570ed13d9 ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net

..."202 www.out" >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables fi #Clean tables and rules ip rule del prio 100 fwmark 2 table www.out ip route flush table www.out #Routing of marked packets ip rule add prio 100 fwmark 2 table www.out ip route add table www.out to local 0/0 dev lo ip route flush cache #ipvsadm rules ipvsadm -A --fwmark-service 2 ipvsadm -a --fwmark-service 2 --real-server $SRV01 --gatewaying ipvsadm -a --fwmark-service 2 --real-server $SRV02 --gatewaying ipvsadm -a --fwmark-service 2 --real-server $SRV03 --gatewaying As you can see, I mark all packets not directed to the virtual server...

...g, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean). So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn't appear in the ipvsadm output. So I stopped and restarted Pulse. And now *none* of the servers appear in the ipvsadm output. Pulse says it started clean, and nothing in the syslog. The gratuitous arp gets made, and the correct IPs are assigned to the correct interfaces. [ddb at prcapp02 ~]$ sudo ipvsadm IP Virtual S...

Hi, I'm having this problem with load balancer. I already setup the load balancer and two servers behind it with this kind of topology ----------------------------------------------------- request -> DIRECTOR -- Server 1 \ Server 2 ----------------------------------------------------- DIRECTOR's (RHEL 5) Virtual

...;'s a quick example of a working configuration : . dom0 has a public IP address, no services but ssh available . domU has a RFC1918 address, linked to a bridge on the second ethernet interface of the dom0 We want to redirect the port 2222 of the dom0 to the port 22 of the domU : - Install ipvsadm on the dom0 (apt-get install ipvsadm on debian) - Setup the VIP : # ipvsadm -A -t <public_ip>:2222 -s rr We choosed the Round-Robin algorithm, but obviously this has no effect for us as there will be only one real server behind the loadbalancer - Insert domU''s private IP on the V...

...opt/mirrors/centos/4.2 $ find -type f | grep "\.rpm" | while read i; do rpm -K "$i"; done | egrep -v ": \(sha1\) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK\$" centosplus/SRPMS/reiserfs-utils-3.6.19-2.1.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK extras/SRPMS/drbd-0.7.14-1.centos4.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK extras/SRPMS/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#db42a60e) updates/SRPMS/ethereal-0.10.13-1.EL4.1.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK The previous packages seem to lack gpg signatures (and ipvsadm seems to have a signature unlike all the other packages...) Cheers, MaZe.

...al server IP but not for LVS/DR. This is the way LVS/DR is working: the destination address in the IP header is not changed, it is same for all real servers: the VIP. --- so that´s what I did: I had to setup my VS WITH IP-TUNNELING and make an entry like this -> for the load balancer (LVS) ipvsadm -A -f 100 -s lc ipvsadm -a -f 100 -r <realserver1_IP> -i ipvsadm -a -f 100 -r <realserver2_IP> -i ipvsadm -a -f 100 -r <realserver3_IP> -i having a rule in my ipchains table like that: # ipchains -A input -p http -s <client-IP> -m 1 and setting up a CBQ filter # tc fil...

...accessing oracle application using VIP of piranha by http://192.168.23.3:8004/ Real server ips, hostname and gateway 192.168.17.16 dev.xxx.com having gateway of piranha Internal vip 192.168.17.121 192.168.17.17 uat.xxx.com having gateway of piranha Internal vip 192.168.17.121 my ipvsadm rule is like below 192.168.23.3:8004 ---->>192.168.17.16:8004 192.168.23.3:8004 ---->>192.168.17.17:8004 For me load balancing is working fine for http://192.168.23.3:8004/ . But once i logged in when ever i tried to browse any Oracle Application Forms then it is giving me error &quo...

I have installed two CentOS 4.3 boxes with LVS (from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/csgfs/ ) but all boxes died withe this error frequently: kernel panic - not syncing: fs/block_dev.c:396: spin_lock (fs/block_dev.c:c0361c0) already locked by fs/block_dev.c/287. I have read from this thread http://threebit.net/mail-archive/centos/msg00243.html that this is an unsolved problem. So i have

...chkconfig |grep ip ip6tables 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ipmievd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ipsec 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off iptables 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ipvsadm 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off Yet - when I reboot iptables gets started - if I run OPGX280 ~ # /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables status Table: filter Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) num target prot opt source destination 1 ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0...

Hello All Currently on a CentOS 4.3 system with the 2.6.14.3 kernel. Is there a recommend way to properly recompile the kernel? I was thinking of dling the source from kernel.org, but I was told that using SRPMs would be better? Any suggestions ? Thank You -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...eive announcment from client send answer to client. Answer packet contain ipadress of samba server. But this IP is real samba server IP(in my case internal) and client cannot connect directly samba. Exist any way how can nmbd sent to client VIP address instead internal address. Thanks a lot. my ipvsadm rules: root@lvs ~]# ipvsadm -Ln IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP 195.146.40.1:139 rr -> 192.168.30.10:139 Masq 1 0 0 UDP 195.146.40.1:13...

Hi, I've got a couple of machines acting as directors with service=lvs Is there something similar to 'clustat' for pulse+lvsd? I need this in order to make our monitorization scripts "cluster-aware", or else one node will have critical status when there are less nannies than it expected because the services ran over to the other node. Thanks in advance, Rui -- + No

Guys, one of our boxes just died with the following error: kernel panic - not syncing: fs/block_dev.c:396: spin_lock (fs/block_dev.c:c0361c0) already locked by fs/block_dev.c/287. The system's an LVS running CentOS 4.3: centos-release-4-3.2 kernel-2.6.9-34.EL ipvsadm-1.24-6 heartbeat-1.2.3.cvs.20050927-1.centos4 I note that there's a bug report filed related to CentOS 4.2: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1201&nbn=7 I was just wondering, would you like a bug report filed for this? Will.