Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "iptrani".
Did you mean:
iptrany
2017 Jul 11
2
Using new types v32f32, v32f64 in llvm backend not possible
Hello,
i want to work with these types v32f32, v32f64.... in llvm which are
undefined in the backend?
But v32i32, v32i64 are already defined so i am able to use these.
but for other types such as v32f32, v32f64 although i have defined them
appropriately in all the files like machinevaluetype.h, valuetypes.cpp
etc. i have checked it many times but still getting the following error
when build in
2017 Jul 11
2
Using new types v32f32, v32f64 in llvm backend not possible
Thank you so much. it run fine.
Can you please resolve following issue;
I now have support for v2048i32
but my backend supports v64i32
so ultimately v2048i32 needs to be split into 32 v64i32 instructions. the
only difference between 2 is if its orginally v2048i32 i want my registers
assignment from REG_A set. if its v64i32 originally, then i want registers
from set REG_B.
How to accomplish
2015 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Overloaded intrinsics: name explosion
Hi,
So, we currently have gc.result.int, gc.result.float. gc.result.ptr,
gc.relocate, and gc.statepoint. gc.statepoint's signature is fine with
a iPTRAny as the first argument. gc.result is in trouble, because none
of the signatures admit even a simple array of integers, and there's
no aAny. And certainly no vectors. So we can get a gc.result.vector to
add to this mess, and admit [1] to
2017 Jul 12
2
Using new types v32f32, v32f64 in llvm backend not possible
I would be very grateful if you specify whether there is some way to
allocate registers (different order) / from different register sets to the
same instruction based on the vector width/ no of iterations.
I have tried several alternatives but could not succeed.
Also I have asked this question many times but no one responds.
Is there something wrong with this??
Kindly guide me.
Thank You
On
2010 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] Question: overloaded intrinsic
I am working on an implementation that needs to add a couple of overloaded intrinsics (based on pointer to different address spaces). I am creating a new myintrinsics.td file and using the iPTRAny for the argument type.
The current interface (i.e. getName() and getTyp() in Intrinsics.h) seems to require the caller to know which arguments are used for overloading, so to set Tys and numTys. This
2010 Apr 21
1
[LLVMdev] Bufer overrun in getValueTypeList()
Hello,
I've observed in some tests that getValueTypeList() is sometimes called with type MVT::iPTR. There is a discrepancy between the size of the array VTs and the use in getTypeValueList(). The array is allocated with space for elements up to LAST_VALUE_TYPE and iPTR is defined after it. The enumerator value of iPTR is between LAST_VALUE_TYPE and LastSimpleValueType. For this reason the