search for: ipt_masquerad

...1296 0 ip6t_ipv6header 1072 0 ip6t_mh 704 0 ip6t_rt 1520 0 ip6table_filter 608 1 ip6table_mangle 1040 1 ip6table_raw 576 1 ip_tables 9181 4 iptable_nat,iptable_raw,iptable_mangle,iptable_filter, ipt_MASQUERADE 1088 1 ipt_REJECT 1808 2 iptable_filter 672 1 iptable_mangle 912 1 iptable_nat 1680 1 iptable_raw 640 1 ipv6 237119 28 ip6t_REJECT,ip6table_mangle,nf_conntrack_ipv6,nf_defrag_ipv6, jbd2 4670...

..., the problem is that after that i get: # iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j IMQ --todev 0 iptables: No chain/target/match by that name so i can not redirect ttraffic to IMQ device. and modules are loaded. - # lsmod Module Size Used by ipt_ipp2p 6656 2 ipt_MASQUERADE 2688 1 sch_sfq 4864 31 cls_u32 6660 8 sch_htb 14208 2 ipt_IMQ 1792 0 imq 3592 0 xt_mac 1792 19 ipt_LOG 5504 2 xt_limit 2304 2 xt_multiport...

...1 (autoclean) nls_iso8859-1 2880 1 (autoclean) smbfs 31680 1 (autoclean) serial 43968 0 (autoclean) (unused) af_packet 11144 2 (autoclean) ipt_TCPMSS 2368 1 (autoclean) ipt_TOS 1024 22 (autoclean) ipt_MASQUERADE 1216 2 (autoclean) ipt_MARK 736 13 (autoclean) ipt_LOG 3168 92 (autoclean) ipt_state 608 169 (autoclean) ip_nat_ftp 2944 0 (unused) ip_conntrack_ftp 3200 0 (unused) smc-ultra 5024 1 (autoclea...

...ader 1072 0 >ip6t_mh 704 0 >ip6t_rt 1520 0 >ip6table_filter 608 1 >ip6table_mangle 1040 1 >ip6table_raw 576 1 >ip_tables 9181 4 >iptable_nat,iptable_raw,iptable_mangle,iptable_filter, >ipt_MASQUERADE 1088 1 >ipt_REJECT 1808 2 >iptable_filter 672 1 >iptable_mangle 912 1 >iptable_nat 1680 1 >iptable_raw 640 1 >ipv6 237119 28 >ip6t_REJECT,ip6table_mangle,nf_conntrack_ipv6,nf_defrag_ipv6,...

...on this system." Consistent with this, there is no /proc/net/ip_masquerade. On the other hand, the load balancer *IS* working; those connections *are* getting NATted and routed. Also, lsmod shows varous relevant modules loaded: iptable_nat 40773 1 ip_nat 53101 2 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat ip_conntrack 91237 5 xt_state,ip_conntrack_netbios_ns,ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,ip_nat nfnetlink 40457 2 ip_nat,ip_conntrack ip_tables 55329 2 iptable_filter,iptable_nat x_tables 50377 7 xt_state,ipt_REJECT,xt_tcpudp,ipt_MASQUERADE...

Does anyone keep a known telemarketer caller id database? If not has anyone proposed an Asterisk community project to share this information? Sort of a nation wide blacklist so Asterisk'ers can cut down on the garbage calls... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...le ip_nat_tftp loadmodule ip_nat_irc loadmodule ip_nat_h323 We are running the kernel-2.6.3-15mdk with shorewall-2.0.3a-1mdk. And lsmod | grep ip shows this: ip_nat_h323 4128 0 ip_conntrack_h323 4132 0 ipv6 232416 16 ipt_TOS 2240 12 ipt_MASQUERADE 3424 1 ipt_REJECT 6464 4 ipt_pkttype 1536 4 ipt_LOG 5312 10 ipt_state 1728 25 ipt_multiport 1856 0 ipt_conntrack 2304 0 iptable_mangle 2624 1 ip_nat_irc 4112 0 ip_nat_tftp...

...th lp --with ac --with asus_acpi --with battery --with autofs4 myinitrd.img 2.6.16.33-xen But, it is occuring error on boot. Would you advice on me? Please, help me. I''m getting tired.. I tried for 2 weeks. $ uname -r 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5 $ lsmod Module Size Used by ipt_MASQUERADE 7617 0 iptable_nat 11205 0 ip_nat 20973 2 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat bridge 53341 0 autofs4 24517 2 hidp 23105 2 rfcomm 42457 0 l2cap 29505 10 hidp,rfcomm bluetooth...

...h specyfic. For me the following modules are loaded ~# lsmod | grep xt_ xt_limit 2624 0 xt_mark 2176 0 xt_length 2112 0 xt_MARK 2944 22 xt_tcpudp 3648 17 xt_state 2176 2 ip_conntrack 51052 4 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,ip_nat,xt_state x_tables 11080 12 xt_limit,ipt_tos,ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,ipt_IMQ,xt_mark,xt_length,xt_MARK,ipt_REJECT,xt_tcpudp,xt_state,ip_tables and I get error with the following rule ~# iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --syn -m connlimit --connlimit-above 60 -j REJEC...

...t_mh 704 0 >>ip6t_rt 1520 0 >>ip6table_filter 608 1 >>ip6table_mangle 1040 1 >>ip6table_raw 576 1 >>ip_tables 9181 4 >>iptable_nat,iptable_raw,iptable_mangle,iptable_filter, >>ipt_MASQUERADE 1088 1 >>ipt_REJECT 1808 2 >>iptable_filter 672 1 >>iptable_mangle 912 1 >>iptable_nat 1680 1 >>iptable_raw 640 1 >>ipv6 237119 28 >>ip6t_REJECT,ip6table_mangle,nf_co...

[CC'ing the list] On Feb 23, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Tim Dawson wrote: > I don't think USB support is a given in OpwnWRT - some builds have it, some don't, and some are just a bit wonky. > Most USB builds support USB disk - the USB serial driver is a different beast, and even if one is there does not imply the other. > > I'd be interested in the output of 'lsmod',

...er/ip_nat_core.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 962 (offset 9 lines). patching file net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_standalone.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 221 (offset -5 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 300 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 succeeded at 330 with fuzz 2 (offset -5 lines). patching file net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 88. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_MASQUERADE.c.rej patching file net/ipv4/route.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 918 (offset 68 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 1275 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 succeeded at 1356 (offset 68 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 1...

Hi, ok Im all new to this :-) for pasv ftp in your example you say for example to use ports 65500-65535, but i dont see that u open those ports in your example fw scripts..? any hints ? -- Christophe Zwecker mail: doc@zwecker.de Hamburg, Germany fon: +49 179 3994867 http://www.zwecker.de "Who is General Failure ? And why is he reading my disk

I have had a web server listining sql-1433, www 80, ftp-21 using proxy arp with sub-netting in a three interface DMZ. All these ports are in the rules file as ACCEPT. With one exeception that 1433 allows a few host from the net. 21 and 80 allow all net to dmz connections. The policy is DMZ to net ACCEPT This has been working great for about a month or more until I rebooted the

...960 0 (unused) ipt_unclean 6784 0 (unused) iptable_filter 1728 1 ipt_length 512 0 (unused) ipt_TOS 1024 12 ipt_TCPMSS 2368 0 (unused) ipt_REJECT 2784 4 ipt_REDIRECT 736 0 (unused) ipt_MASQUERADE 1216 0 (unused) ipt_LOG 3168 0 (unused) ip_nat_irc 2336 0 (unused) ip_nat_ftp 2944 0 (unused) iptable_nat 12980 3 [ipt_REDIRECT ipt_MASQUERADE ip_nat_irc ip_nat_ftp] ip_tables 10528 22 [ipt_ULOG iptable_ma...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 10:55 ------- This looks strange. The BUG in slab.c tells us that there is a GFP_ATOMIC missing. This means that we are allocating kernel memory from softirq context with only GFP_KERNEL. If I understand your backtrace correctly, what happens is: - you are

...323 Helpers in your kernel and iptables If I list my modules the h323 NAT and connection tracking modules are listed: # lsmod | grep h323 nf_nat_h323 12937 0 nf_conntrack_h323 42418 1 nf_nat_h323 nf_nat 18378 15 nf_nat_ftp,nf_nat_irc,nf_nat_sip,nf_nat_amanda,ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat_proto_gre,ip6t_MASQUERADE,nf_nat_h323,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_ipv6,nf_nat_pptp,nf_nat_tftp,xt_nat,ip6table_nat,iptable_nat nf_conntrack 59734 39 nf_nat_ftp,nf_nat_irc,nf_nat_sip,nf_nat_amanda,xt_CT,nf_nat_snmp_basic,nf_conntrack_netbios_ns,nf_conntrack_proto_gre,xt_helper,ipt_MASQUER...

2014-02-23 17:57 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > >> The problem is that I don't know where to configure it. >> >> Anyone with a UPS connect to a OpenWRT device? > > What version of OpenWRT? > > I haven't tried this myself, but it looks like recent versions of OpenWRT use UCI,

Hello, I am not able to see vrbr0 in my box. Can some one help me with this ? . I am trying KVM+libvirt and planing to use Routed mode. I hope this virbr0 must be up for using this . I can give an strace too. OS : Debian , kernel 3.12.0 libvrit version : 0.9.8 ____________________________________________________________________ root@:~# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr

...--------------------------------- >> default inactive yes >> >> root@:~# virsh net-start default >> error: Failed to start network default >> error: failed to add iptables rule to enable masquerading >> > seems like your kernel doesn't have ipt_MASQUERADE installed. > try modprobe ipt_MASQUERADE > Hi Gao, Yes , it looks like I am missing more module. I will recompile the kernel and test more, the following is the reason behind this issue. root@:~# tail /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log 2013-11-22 07:43:06.388+0000: 4328: error : virComman...