search for: ipsis

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ipsis".

Did you mean: ipis
2008 Jun 25
1
help_transformation
heya, i am fitting linear mixed effect model to a response Y. Y shows an s-shaped distribution when using QQ-plots (some zero values and some very high values). hence, which transformation should i apply that Y follows a normal distribution? any r-function/package available to do this? thanks for any hint, regards, lukas ??? Lukas Indermaur, PhD student eawag / Swiss Federal Institute of
2009 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] Google's Go
On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: >> >> >>> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's >>> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler. >> >> I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself... > > Compared to a
1998 Jun 26
0
smbmount from samba-1.9.18p8, Linux-2.1.107 and no joy
Hello all, after hacking around to get smbmount and smbmnt to get compiled on RedHat-5.1 I'm unable to use them. With the stock RedHat kernel and the old smbmount I used the following command line: smbmount //rho/homes /mnt/smb/homes -c pc-topaz -U pommnitz -u pommnitz -P mypassword Everything works fine this way (with 2.0.34). With 2.1.107 the new smbmount is required. As I said, after some
2009 Nov 19
7
[LLVMdev] Google's Go
On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: > > >> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's >> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler. > > I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself... Compared to a compiler in the same category as PCC, whose pinnacle of optimization is doing register allocation? I'm not
1998 Nov 17
1
Failure to rename files that have active file handles
We have just installed Samba 1.9.18p10 on an Ultra Sparc, Solaris 2.5.1 . So far we have been very impressed with the resilience and performance of Samba in contrast to Hummingbird and Solstice NFS products while doing large product builds on our NT4.0 sp4 machines. However we have come across one little problem, which may be down to configuration, that has left us "worried" about