Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ipsec'd".
Did you mean:
ipsec
2004 Aug 06
0
a new directory service
...scan huge netblocks of cable
modem users, looking for the occasional target to haX0r. But that doesn't
stop the people who do.
And to Allen, yes, I know that it wouldn't stop all MitM attacks. That's
why I said "nearly eliminate". Hell, I'd rather all traffic be fully
IPSec'd (ESP + AH) all the time, but that's just not feasible. Frankly, I
don't know if the data involved is worth the overhead of even an SSL
connection, much less some full key-exchange method.
In the end, I'm just tossing out some ideas. I'm not the one who's
actually going...
2004 Aug 06
4
a new directory service
> A fully-encrypted connection would nearly eliminate the possibility of a
> man-in-the-middle attack either hijacking the session or surreptitiously
> switching bits mid-stream and changing the traffic on the fly.
A man-in-the-middle attack is not easy to pull off. If you can show me
why some person would be incented to attack someone like this, then
maybe there is a case for it.
As