search for: iprouter

Good morning, I''m writing to ask for collaboration in finding an improvement to a particular process. Today: To get traffic for our IDS sensors and a billing system, we collect everything at our core switches (2) by connecting a SPAN port from each switch to a server (so, 2 interfaces collecting traffic). That server changes the destination MAC address on all traffic to that of

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0570 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0570.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 31a7240ff770ddd2f18715bccd1907f290b22468f2fa7d654e912e242cdeafcb iproute-2.6.32-32.el6_5.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1814 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1814.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 11b560b8b12bef924870b17dd0580fe72624e17d692d7206870738a5999abbc6 iproute-2.6.32-33.el6_6.i686.rpm

Subject says it all... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0417 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0417.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8c69bdfc16cc4ddccb73c38491522f13b2b560caec4bfca88112050d750180a1 iproute-2.6.32-23.el6.i686.rpm

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:15:39 +0100 "PIOTREK H." <komarekmz@tlen.pl> wrote: > Welcome > > I have a problem with the new iproute "iproute2-2.6.37.tar.bz2 07-Jan-2011 9:18 (the problem from version 2010 to 2011). > Three problems: > a) with filters for UDP traffic > problem affects only the queuing traffic to the machine on which you work qos > In the case

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1276 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1276.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 866debd9507a39fa83ccfc6bdba54ad872b56220db2eba7798145a080423611b iproute-3.10.0-54.el7_2.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:0808 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0808 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: abf0bf331ab7c24a12bf898ac03213e8fc8b812bc63d938c28f6aa278c59573a iproute-4.11.0-14.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3985 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3985 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 15715636a7e96f4bc322dd352ee4acf3b67a2c903d3fe91b9384e7e57484f387 iproute-4.11.0-25.el7_7.2.x86_64.rpm

Anyone to know iproute-save, iproute-restore like script similar iptables-save/restore ? that stores everytihng routes,rules,tables everything ... then init.d-script that among other things stores the state on shutdown :") (thats easy then) ----- http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2004-12-08-004-32-OS-BZ-DT-0005 snip> MS Office is popular in the same way as heart disease is the

I'm getting a strange error while rebuilding iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.src.rpm ... rpmbuild --rebuild iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.src.rpm ... ./normal >normal.dist *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x08491050 *** /bin/sh: line 1: 5236 Aborted ./normal >normal.dist make[1]: *** [normal.dist] Error 134 ... + install -m 644 tc/normal.dist

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1153 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1153.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e8c793f6d9912b63c3281b2bd94ef978bd30df485d17b56b6c7df44b5ccce649 iproute-2.6.18-15.el5.i386.rpm x86_64:

i have both packages round, what are the diffs iproute2 justa follow on too iproute? Chris K Ellsworth _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of

Hi List, i have a realy strange problem with no solution yet, i''m using iproute together with the iptables mangle option, in a dmz network is a cisco pix present with another inet link behind, therefore i''m using the mangle option to split traffic on a protocol base like: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -s 192.168.1.5 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 3 and add the

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hello, I have had a lot of success installing/configuring shorewall on my own system using webmin. Recently, I have been contracted to do some remote admin on a isp co-lo box all through a webmin server index connection from my locally running webmin server connected to the remote server. I was able to download shorewall from: http://shorewall.infohiiway.com/pub/shorewall/LATEST.rpm but when

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1453 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1453.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1696052dc92d5c6f692841653549a25f iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.i386.rpm Source: 5c35f60f79ab3702361d090877ccb4b8 iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1453 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1453.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 00d1e239e19b91e0919546db00dea4b8 iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 5c35f60f79ab3702361d090877ccb4b8 iproute-2.6.18-13.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes

I am using policy based routing and I have 3 route tables setup, ADSLLink1, ADSLLink2, and ADSLLoadBalanced, "ip route show <table>" will show me the routes that I have added to the first two, but not from ADSLLoadBalanced, it will show the last route that was added to the table but no others. There are approx 16 routes added to the table, I know they are there because they work,