search for: iphelp

Hi, I'm trying to build several SCL perl516 modules for using assp spamfilter. Some modules have dependencies which spend a lot of errors or can not be build on a x86_64 system. perl-Email-Valid-0.184 for example needs Win32::IPHelper and Win32::TieRegistry. If I build this rpm for standard perl510, the Win32 modules are not required. Why are theses dependencies only for perl516? Can I exclude the Win32 modules without getting problems? Does anyone have a few tips? Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Nicole

...nder all the Intel Boot Agent versions I tried - only need to set the mtftp-server address as per recommendations in the PXE 2.1 spec. Is there any interest in me publishing this boot server ack-packet script for others to use? Microsoft and others want us to drop DHCP options and instead implement iphelpers in the router (if clients and servers are on separate subnets), but shouldn't be necessary as far as I can see. The origin of all this mess is again the PXE specification in my opinion... Jan-Frode ________________________________________ From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> S...

...nder all the Intel Boot Agent versions I tried - only need to set the mtftp-server address as per recommendations in the PXE 2.1 spec. Is there any interest in me publishing this boot server ack-packet script for others to use? Microsoft and others want us to drop DHCP options and instead implement iphelpers in the router (if clients and servers are on separate subnets), but shouldn't be necessary as far as I can see. The origin of all this mess is again the PXE specification in my opinion... Intel Boot Agent? Really? I've NEVER seen mention of "Intel Boot Agent" on UEFI. I'...

...nder all the Intel Boot Agent versions I tried - only need to set the mtftp-server address as per recommendations in the PXE 2.1 spec. Is there any interest in me publishing this boot server ack-packet script for others to use? Microsoft and others want us to drop DHCP options and instead implement iphelpers in the router (if clients and servers are on separate subnets), but shouldn't be necessary as far as I can see. The origin of all this mess is again the PXE specification in my opinion... Intel Boot Agent? Really? I've NEVER seen mention of "Intel Boot Agent" on UEFI. I'...

Hi, I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module

...nder all the Intel Boot Agent versions I tried - only need to set the mtftp-server address as per recommendations in the PXE 2.1 spec. Is there any interest in me publishing this boot server ack-packet script for others to use? Microsoft and others want us to drop DHCP options and instead implement iphelpers in the router (if clients and servers are on separate subnets), but shouldn't be necessary as far as I can see. The origin of all this mess is again the PXE specification in my opinion... > > Intel Boot Agent? Really? I've NEVER seen mention of "Intel Boot > Agent" o...