Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "ipcb".
Did you mean:
ipc
2005 Feb 24
1
IPCB
Has anyone ever used IPCB to terminate calls. I tried to connect my asterisk server to them and it says 403 Forbidden. I opened up the chat window and chatted with them for about 2 hours and we couldn't come up with a resolution. I guess even though there site says they use 5060 for sip the person I talked to said th...
2016 Jul 04
2
[PATCH] core/lwip: Avoid immediate reuse of UDP port numbers
...PORT_RANGE_START
-/* From http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers:
- "The Dynamic and/or Private Ports are those from 49152 through 65535" */
-#define UDP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE_START 0xc000
-#define UDP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE_END 0xffff
-#endif
- port = UDP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE_START;
- ipcb = udp_pcbs;
- while ((ipcb != NULL) && (port != UDP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE_END)) {
- if (ipcb->local_port == port) {
- /* port is already used by another udp_pcb */
- port++;
- /* restart scanning all udp pcbs */
- ipcb = udp_pcbs;
- } else {
- /...
2000 Oct 11
1
Bug? (PR#690)
...-------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Armando Mateus Ferreira
Escuela Técnica Superior de Inginieros Agrónomos y Montes
Universidad de Córdoba-España
Avda. Menendez Pidal, 14080 Córdoba
td2mafea@uco.es
Escola Superior Agrária
6000 Castelo Branco-Portugal
armando@esa.ipcb.pt
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@s...
2015 Jan 28
2
[PATCH 1/3] ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO/GSO segmentation if not set.
...ality to
> pre-916e4cf46d0204 ("ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data").
I understand (the patch fixed a NULL ptr deref btw.).
As I said, I don't want to stop this series (hopefully the flag can be
moved into skb_shared_info etc.), would look after that IMHO
(skb flags/IPCB and skb_shared_info have different semantics on
__skb_clone).
I think it is very much worth to try to move the fragmentation id
generation back to the end host and only use this as a fallback.
Bye,
Hannes
2015 Jan 28
2
[PATCH 1/3] ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO/GSO segmentation if not set.
...ality to
> pre-916e4cf46d0204 ("ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data").
I understand (the patch fixed a NULL ptr deref btw.).
As I said, I don't want to stop this series (hopefully the flag can be
moved into skb_shared_info etc.), would look after that IMHO
(skb flags/IPCB and skb_shared_info have different semantics on
__skb_clone).
I think it is very much worth to try to move the fragmentation id
generation back to the end host and only use this as a fallback.
Bye,
Hannes
2015 Jan 28
0
[PATCH 1/3] ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO/GSO segmentation if not set.
...04 ("ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data").
>
> I understand (the patch fixed a NULL ptr deref btw.).
>
> As I said, I don't want to stop this series (hopefully the flag can be
> moved into skb_shared_info etc.), would look after that IMHO
> (skb flags/IPCB and skb_shared_info have different semantics on
> __skb_clone).
>
> I think it is very much worth to try to move the fragmentation id
> generation back to the end host and only use this as a fallback.
I think we are in agreement here.
-vlad
>
> Bye,
> Hannes
>
>
2015 Jan 28
0
[PATCH 1/3] ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO/GSO segmentation if not set.
...04 ("ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data").
>
> I understand (the patch fixed a NULL ptr deref btw.).
>
> As I said, I don't want to stop this series (hopefully the flag can be
> moved into skb_shared_info etc.), would look after that IMHO
> (skb flags/IPCB and skb_shared_info have different semantics on
> __skb_clone).
>
> I think it is very much worth to try to move the fragmentation id
> generation back to the end host and only use this as a fallback.
I think we are in agreement here.
-vlad
>
> Bye,
> Hannes
>
>
2008 Sep 12
4
Custom build kernel patch fails big time.
...goto error;
- err = x->mode->output(skb);
+ err = x->mode->output(skb);
if (err)
goto error;
@@ -85,6 +87,7 @@
}
dst = skb->dst;
x = dst->xfrm;
+
} while (x && !x->props.mode);
IPCB(skb)->flags |= IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
diff -urN a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.c
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.c 2007-05-25 12:21:11.000000000 +0300
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.c 2007-05-25 12:21:11.000000000 +0300
@@ -28,13 +28,20 @@
static int ipip_init_state(struct xfrm_...
2015 Jan 28
7
[PATCH 1/3] ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO/GSO segmentation if not set.
Hi,
On Mi, 2015-01-28 at 11:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:25:08AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Di, 2015-01-27 at 18:08 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:02:31PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > On Di, 2015-01-27 at 09:26 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
2015 Jan 28
7
[PATCH 1/3] ipv6: Select fragment id during UFO/GSO segmentation if not set.
Hi,
On Mi, 2015-01-28 at 11:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:25:08AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Di, 2015-01-27 at 18:08 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:02:31PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > On Di, 2015-01-27 at 09:26 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: