search for: ip_local_reserved_ports

Could you please send me the output of command "sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports". Apart from output of command please send the logs to look into the issue. Thanks Gaurav On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > +Gaurav, he is the author of the patch, can you please comment here? > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at...

Thanks, but my current settings are: net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 30000-32767 net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 60999 meaning the reserved ports are already in the short int range, so maybe I misunderstood something? or is it a different issue? From: Atin Mukherjee [mailto:amukherj at redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM To: Guy Cukierman &...

.... I will trying to reproduce on some other machine. Will update you as s0on as possible. Thanks Gaurav On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Below please find the reserved ports and log, thanks. > > > > sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports: > > net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 30000-32767 > > > > > > glusterd.log: > > [2017-06-18 07:04:17.853162] I [MSGID: 106487] [glusterd-handler.c:1242:__glusterd_handle_cli_probe] > 0-glusterd: Received CLI probe req 192.168.1.17 24007 > > [2017-06-18 07:04...

Hi, Below please find the reserved ports and log, thanks. sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports: net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 30000-32767 glusterd.log: [2017-06-18 07:04:17.853162] I [MSGID: 106487] [glusterd-handler.c:1242:__glusterd_handle_cli_probe] 0-glusterd: Received CLI probe req 192.168.1.17 24007 [2017-06-18 07:04:17.853237] D [MSGID: 0] [common-utils.c:3361:gf_is_local_addr]...

+Gaurav, he is the author of the patch, can you please comment here? On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> wrote: > Thanks, but my current settings are: > > net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 30000-32767 > > net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 60999 > > meaning the reserved ports are already in the short int range, so maybe I > misunderstood something? or is it a different issue? > > > > *From:* Atin Mukherjee [mailto:amukherj at redhat.com] > *Sent:*...

...you as s0on > as possible. > > > Thanks > Gaurav > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Below please find the reserved ports and log, thanks. >> >> >> >> sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports: >> >> net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 30000-32767 >> >> >> >> >> >> glusterd.log: >> >> [2017-06-18 07:04:17.853162] I [MSGID: 106487] >> [glusterd-handler.c:1242:__glusterd_handle_cli_probe] 0-glusterd: >> Received CLI pro...

...ly. I will trying to reproduce on some other machine. Will update you as s0on as possible. Thanks Gaurav On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com<mailto:guyc at elminda.com>> wrote: Hi, Below please find the reserved ports and log, thanks. sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports: net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 30000-32767 glusterd.log: [2017-06-18 07:04:17.853162] I [MSGID: 106487] [glusterd-handler.c:1242:__glusterd_handle_cli_probe] 0-glusterd: Received CLI probe req 192.168.1.17 24007 [2017-06-18 07:04:17.853237] D [MSGID: 0] [common-utils.c:3361:gf_is_local_addr]...

https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of 3.10 should have this fix. If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this going? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a gluster (version 3...

Hi, I have a gluster (version 3.10.2) server running on a 3 node (centos7) cluster. Firewalld and SELinux are disabled, and I see I can telnet from each node to the other on port 24007. When I try to create the first peering by running on node1 the command: gluster peer probe <node2 ip address> I get the error: "Connection failed. Please check if gluster daemon is operational."

...eboot, Fedora 28. Restarting dovecot fixes the problem. Does anyone know if it could be related to this bug report? *https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=103401#c130 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=103401#c130> * and suggested work around to add ports to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports? Nov 8 12:21:41 ourdomain dovecot[1386]: Error: service(pop3-login): listen(*, 995) failed: Address already in use Nov 8 12:21:41 ourdomain dovecot[1386]: Error: service(pop3-login): listen(::, 995) failed: Address already in use Nov 8 12:21:41 ourdomain dovecot[1386]: Error: service(imap-login...

In article <1485416344.2047.1.camel at biggs.org.uk>, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > If you are using RAID 1 kernel mirroring, you can do that with /boot too, > > and Grub finds the kernel just fine. I've done it many times: > > > > > Hmm, OK. I wonder why anaconda doesn't do it then. > > Reading various

...SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, [1], 4) = 0 4543 setsockopt(5, SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, [1], 4) = 0 4543 setsockopt(5, SOL_TCP, TCP_KEEPIDLE, [20], 4) = 0 4543 setsockopt(5, SOL_TCP, TCP_KEEPINTVL, [2], 4) = 0 4543 setsockopt(5, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [0], 4) = 0 4543 open("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports", O_RDONLY) = 7 4543 read(7, "\n", 4096) = 1 4543 close(7) = 0 4543 bind(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(49151), sin_addr=inet_addr("100.64.251.6")}, 16) = 0 4543 fcntl(5, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR) 4543 f...