search for: ip6

...3.25 nameserver 172.23.93.3 search msi.mydomain.com mydomain.com === DC0 hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6 172.23.93.25 dc0.msi.mydomain.com dc0 # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters ff02::3 ip6-allhosts === DC1 hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 172.23.93.25 dc0.msi.mydomain.com dc0 172.23.93.26 dc1.msi.mydomain.com dc1 # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1...

Today I received an allocation of IP6 addresses for some servers. I can 'play' with the last 2 of the 8 IP6 address segments. I always thought, mistakenly, IP6 was 6 segments, because it was IP6. IP4 had 4 segments. However IP6 is actually IP version 6 and it has 8 segments. The other interesting discovers are: :: means one o...

I have 2 Ububtu DCs. One acting as a secondary/failover. At one point the users were replicated from primary to secondary. But now they are not replicating. The output from samba-tool drs showrepl is attached. What else may I provide to aid diagnostics? I know Samba does not replicate sysvol 'yet', so rsync is needed, but that does not seem to contain the users. Thank you,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1414 Bug ID: 1414 Summary: Using ip6 daddr in nat input chain is rejected with an incorrect error Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft...

I know I have some quirky behavior involving my layer two tinc host, and the IPv6 subnet that runs off of it. Facebook just issued a kernel patch that changes the behavior of the IPv6 tunnel mechanism: I can't tell from the patch itself, if it might also improve functionality for non IP6-IP6 tunnels. https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/under-the-hood-network-implementation-for-world-ipv6-launch/10150873176303920 http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=133891157525531&w=2 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http:/...

...in.com mydomain.com > === > > DC0 hosts > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6 > 172.23.93.25 dc0.msi.mydomain.com dc0 > > # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts > ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback > fe00::0 ip6-localnet > ff02::1 ip6-allnodes > ff02::2 ip6-allrouters > ff02::3 ip6-allhosts > === > > DC1 hosts > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 172.23.93.25 dc0.msi.mydomain.com dc0 > 172.23.93.26 dc1.msi.mydomain.com dc1 > > # The...

Per RFC 8501 seciont 2.2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8501 I have attempted to use a wildcard on a /64 boundary within a zonefile for NSD, but it doesn't not appear to work. PTR lookups fail... tested with, ie: $ORIGIN 1.1.0.0.8.5.1.b.2.2.5.2.ip6.arpa. * PTR my.fqdn.net. Did not work... or would you have to use? (not tested) *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* PTR .... -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP: https://pgp.inoc.net/rblayzor/

...test for s6_addr32 (which is no longer used), and wrote a new test for IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED. The latter is probably portable, but since we're already in the business of testing, it does not hurt to do so. Arjen, I wonder about server/access.c, line 60-61: return (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(ip6) && ((((const u_int32_t *)ip6)[3] & (u_int32_t)prefix) == net->s_addr)); Comparing this with line 38: return((((struct sockaddr_in*)ip_addr)->sin_addr.s_addr & htonl(prefix)) == ((struct sockaddr_in*)net_addr)->sin_addr.s_addr); I wonder if it shouldn'...

..., whats wrong here... >/etc/resolv.conf points to the dc as a nameserver > >search mydom.lan >nameserver IP.of.my.dc > >/etc/hosts >127.0.0.1 localhost >xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx fs.mydom.lan fs > ># The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts >::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback >ff02::1 ip6-allnodes >ff02::2 ip6-allrouters Nothing in my opinion. So a new big mistry.. Why does : net rpc rights list accounts -U"MYDOM\Administrator" work with dhcp and a /etc/hosts with only 127.0.0.1 in it. and why does a server with static ip...

...'fileserver) > > Rowland Thanks for your quick reply. /etc/resolv.conf points to the dc as a nameserver search mydom.lan nameserver IP.of.my.dc /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx fs.mydom.lan fs # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters The IPs are correct Harry

...ix 2001:888:13b3::/64 { AdvOnLink on; AdvAutonomous on; AdvRouterAddr off; }; }; ----------- Then, when I start tinc on a vpn-client I see the following traffic coming through (at the server side): mauer:/usr/local/var/open3600-spool# tcpdump ip6 -i fvhglobalnet -n tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on fvhglobalnet, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 18:55:07.318963 IP6 fe80::c446:8ff:fea2:724c > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16 18:55:09.288642 IP6 fe80::c446...

Thanks Rowland, Contents of /etc/hosts: /127.0.0.1 localhost////127.0.0.1 printserver//////# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts////::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback////fe00::0 ip6-localnet////ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix////ff02::1 ip6-allnodes////ff02::2 ip6-allrouters/// and /etc/hostname: /printserver/ I have changed workgroup name now, and removed the .LOCAL in the end. I tried to change/127.0.0.1 printserver/ to/10.10.1.18 printser...

On 10/10/2020 14:20, Philip Offermans wrote: > I have 2 samba servers. A domain controller, and a domain member. > > Domain controller(GAIA): > > /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 ? ? ? localhost > 192.168.88.2? ? gaia.rompen.lokaal gaia > ::1 ? ? ? ? ? ? localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback > ff02::1 ? ? ? ? ip6-allnodes > ff02::2 ? ? ? ? ip6-allrouters > > 127.0.1.1 ? ? ? gaia I would remove the '127.0.1.1' from /etc/hosts, ensure whatever requires it isn't using port 53 on 127.0.0.1 and that 192.168.88.2 is a fixed ipaddress for gaia...

...rturo.borrero.glez at gmail.c | |om --- Comment #1 from Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez at gmail.com> --- I think this problems has nothing to do with loopback addresses, it seems to be with the netlink code generation: nft add rule ip6 t c ip6 saddr ::1 ip6 daddr ::2 --debug=netlink ip6 t c [ payload load 32b @ network header + 8 => reg 1 ] [ cmp eq reg 1 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x01000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x02000000 ] <cmdline>:1:1-44: Error: Could not process rule: Value too large for def...

...things work. I paste my /etc/hosts and ask for hints. pre01svdeb01 = member server pre01svbmd01 = a windows server (member) pre01svdeb02 = samba ADS DC, not even listed here (192.168.16.205) -> 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 pre01svdeb01.my.tld pre01svdeb01 ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters 192.168.16.111 ipfire.my.tld ipfire 192.168.16.203 backup backup.my.tld dc.my.tld dc 192.168.16.226 server-bmd.my.tld server-bmd 192.168.16.230 pre01svbmd01 Step2: understood and fixed something: dc-entry was wrong! krb5.conf...

Hi Rowland Thanks for your reply. I see: $ cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters 127.0.1.1 RPHS So I guess I should edit the hosts file and specify RPHS's fixed IP address. I don't think domain name is relevant for a home network so I won't specify one. Will let you know ho...

Some of my Windows hosts where the main tinc router is, can't ping out to IPv6 external sites. I don't think its a tinc problem though: I use Quagga for routing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20120612/0dd54f13/attachment.html>

...e: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: tad1073 at gmail.com inet.nft:97:44-51: Error: syntax error, unexpected protocol iif $int_if0 ip6 saddr . ip6 daddr . ip6 protocol { $g6dns . $myip_v6 . tcp, $g6dns . $myip_v6 . udp } jump global_dns_in ^^^^^^^^ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment w...

.../etc/hosts and /etc/krb5.conf > > Rowland > Hi, i need to anonimize them a bit but i can post them /etc/hosts: 127.0.0.1 localhost <dc1 ip> dc01.mydomain.net dc01 <dc2 ip> dc02.mydomain.net dc02 # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters resolv.conf: domain mydomain.net search mydomain.net # questo e' l'ip del dominio locale, sempre attivo CON samba4 #nameserver <dc2 ip> # questo e' l'altro dominio, da abilitare SOLO quando samba4 qui e'...

...ple.de 250-director1.rz.hs-example.de 250-8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 PIPELINING MAIL FROM:<hs at schlittermann.de> 250 2.1.0 OK RCPT TO:<heiko at hs-example.de> 250 2.1.5 OK And here is, what TCPDUMP sees (cut for clarity): 00:22:23.029251 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [S], 00:22:23.029376 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [S.], 00:22:23.029660 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [.], 00:22:23.051436 IP6 2001:...