Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "iosapic_ack_edge_irq".
2015 Dec 30
0
[PATCH 03/34] ia64: rename nop->iosapic_nop
...evel_irq	mask_irq
 #define iosapic_enable_level_irq	unmask_irq
 #define iosapic_disable_level_irq	mask_irq
-#define iosapic_ack_level_irq		nop
+#define iosapic_ack_level_irq		iosapic_nop
 
 static struct irq_chip irq_type_iosapic_level = {
 	.name =			"IO-SAPIC-level",
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ iosapic_ack_edge_irq (struct irq_data *data)
 }
 
 #define iosapic_enable_edge_irq		unmask_irq
-#define iosapic_disable_edge_irq	nop
+#define iosapic_disable_edge_irq	iosapic_nop
 
 static struct irq_chip irq_type_iosapic_edge = {
 	.name =			"IO-SAPIC-edge",
-- 
MST
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who
said
> You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into
> sort-of functional state.
This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to
merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone?
Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please?
Note to arch maintainers: please don't
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who
said
> You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into
> sort-of functional state.
This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to
merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone?
Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please?
Note to arch maintainers: please don't
2016 Jan 10
48
[PATCH v3 00/41] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v2:
	- extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches
	teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers
	(__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only),
	should help prevent misuse by arch code
	to address comments by Russell King
	- patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers
	as suggested by  Stefano Stabellini
	- implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh
2016 Jan 10
48
[PATCH v3 00/41] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v2:
	- extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches
	teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers
	(__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only),
	should help prevent misuse by arch code
	to address comments by Russell King
	- patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers
	as suggested by  Stefano Stabellini
	- implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1:
	- replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip
	- add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation,
	  as suggested by David Miller
	- dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant
	  mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes
	  too long then)
I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1:
	- replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip
	- add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation,
	  as suggested by David Miller
	- dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant
	  mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes
	  too long then)
I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the