search for: iort_iommu_config

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "iort_iommu_config".

2017 Nov 17
0
[RFC PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI/IORT: Support paravirtualized IOMMU
...uot;, trigger, &res[num_res++]); + } +} + +static bool __init paravirt_is_coherent(struct acpi_iort_node *node) +{ + struct acpi_iort_pviommu *pviommu; + + pviommu = (struct acpi_iort_pviommu *)node->node_data; + + return pviommu->flags & ACPI_IORT_NODE_PV_CACHE_COHERENT; +} + struct iort_iommu_config { const char *name; int (*iommu_init)(struct acpi_iort_node *node); @@ -1088,6 +1133,13 @@ static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_arm_smmu_cfg __initconst = { .iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_init_resources }; +static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_paravirt_cfg __initconst = { + ....
2017 Nov 17
11
[RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Add virtio-iommu driver
Implement the virtio-iommu driver following version 0.5 of the specification [1]. Previous version of this code was sent back in April [2], implementing the first public RFC. Since then there has been lots of progress and discussion on the specification side, and I think the driver is in a good shape now. The reason patches 1-3 are only RFC is that I'm waiting on feedback from the Virtio TC
2017 Nov 17
11
[RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Add virtio-iommu driver
Implement the virtio-iommu driver following version 0.5 of the specification [1]. Previous version of this code was sent back in April [2], implementing the first public RFC. Since then there has been lots of progress and discussion on the specification side, and I think the driver is in a good shape now. The reason patches 1-3 are only RFC is that I'm waiting on feedback from the Virtio TC