search for: iommu_acpi

Another bundle of issues from Coverity triage. The first one is in x86/mm, and looks scarier than it is. The others are all in xen/drivers and AFAICT are pretty minor. Cheers, Tim.

For one we shouldn''t accept IVHD tables specifying IO-APIC IDs beyond the limit we support (MAX_IO_APICS, currently 128). And then we shouldn''t memset() a pointer allocation of which failed. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c @@ -674,6 +674,13 @@ static u16 __init parse_ivhd_device_spec if ( IO_APIC_ID(apic) != special->handle ) continue; + if ( special->handle >= ARRAY_SIZE(ioapic_sbdf) ) + { +...

...f-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Provide logic in "is_ioapic_overidden()" Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> --- Changes from V2: - Add logic from Jan - Also invalid handle for HPET - Clean up old logics xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c index 89b359c..0e63e35 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd...

...it should use the value instead. --- This patch is supposed to follow the patches: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/2] AMD IOMMU: allow command line overrides for broken IVRS tables Changes in V2: - Fix logic to match the special->used_id with the value provided by users. xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c index 89b359c..8b14112 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd...

Dear mailinglist, I own a Gigabyte motherboard GA 970A UD3 with IOMMU support. Since the update XSA-36 (also part of the latest debian wheezy pkg), the IO-Virtualisation does not work any more as discussed on this mailinglist [0] and [1]. I like to ask, if there is an "official" solution in sight. I''m not sure about my alternatives. How "dangerous" is the

Hi! From other people posting to this list, I know that there has been a bug related to the issue described in Xen Security Advisory 36 that disables iommu for some AMD users like me. However, even when passing "iommu=no-amd-iommu-perdev-intremap" it still disables i/o virtualisatoin. Related Xen dmesg output: (XEN) IVHD Error: Invalid IO-APIC 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Error initialization

1: IOMMU: properly check whether interrupt remapping is enabled 2: AMD IOMMU: only disable when certain IVRS consistency checks fail 3: VT-d: deal with 5500/5520/X58 errata Patch 1 and 2 are version 2 of a previously submitted, then withdrawn patch following up after XSA-36. Patch 3 is version 3 of a patch previously sent by Malcolm and Andrew. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

This patch set adds basic supports for amd next generation iommu (IOMMUv2) hardware. IOMMUv2 supports various new features advertised by iommu extended feature register. It introduces guest level IO translation and supports state-of-the-art ATS/ATC devices with demand paging capability. Please refer to AMD IOMMU Architectural Specification [1] for more details. Thanks, Wei [1]

Hi Jan, After commit 2ca9fbd739b8a72b16dd790d0fff7b75f5488fb8 AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping, booting dom0 stalls several times. Sometimes this results in RCU stall warnings from the dom0 kernel, hitting the "any" key, on normal or serial console, makes the boot continue for a while but it stalls several times. (It also stalls on shutdown BTW) I have