search for: iomem_index

...t io_tab int io_index = io_table_address >> IO_MEM_SHIFT; for (i = 0; i < mmio_cnt; i++) { - if (mmio[i].size && mmio[i].io_index == io_index) { + if (mmio[i].io_index == io_index) { mmio[i].start = mmio[i].size = 0; break; } @@ -466,12 +466,16 @@ static int iomem_index(target_phys_addr_ void unregister_iomem(target_phys_addr_t start) { - int index = iomem_index(start); - if (index) { + unsigned int index; + + for (index = 0; index < mmio_cnt; index++) + if (start == mmio[index].start) + break; + if (index < mmio_cnt) {...

(I posted this on xen-users last week, and nobody seemed to know what was up. It is time, I suppose then, to dust off the debugger; I was hoping one of you could point me in the correct direction to begin troubleshooting this.) I''m HVM booting our install-disks (systemimager) here, and I''m spotting some weird performance issues. Our install uses rsync and prints every

Hi all, this is the long awaited patch series to add xen device model support in qemu; the main author is Anthony Perard. Developing this series we tried to come up with the cleanest possible solution from the qemu point of view, limiting the amount of changes to common code as much as possible. The end result still requires a couple of hooks in piix_pci but overall the impact should be very