search for: io_timeouts

Hi guys! I started to have the problem above last October, 2th. I don´t know why and how, because it was saturday. So, my file server stoped to authenticate against the Samba4 AD. Today, all shares was stopped and then i restarted my Samba4 AD and the file server. All became to work again. But it im afraid because the problem started by itself. Thanks! # MY CRONTAB 17 * * * * root cd /

I've been getting frequent io errors trying to synchronise a local CPAN mirror with the master on ftp.funet.fi, the symptoms being the dreaded rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165) message at the client end. I've replicated this when mirroring from a local CPAN mirror, and the issue seems to

FYI, We've been using the 2.4.7pre1 release for several days now, with nary a hang problem. We haven't seen the EOF bug at all, which was what we upgraded for. This is with transfers of as much as 50GB to set up an initial mirror. The only thing we did was set timeout=0 -- which I guess is unnecessary. The semantics of this flag are a bit unclear. We thought was 'time since

Hello, Thank You for prompt reply! As I stated, I don't have any issues that I'm aware of, but this file server is new in my infrastructure and I was worried that something is incorrect. I set minimal logging as a habit, and I bumped winbind recently to maybe see something that would help me solve this problem. What about this: ads_search_retry: failed to reconnect (No logon servers are

This is where it sets a sort of 60 second timeout if you don't set a timeout at all. As far as what it affects, I'm not that good with the code. I just know that my big syncs would die in almost exactly 1 minute unless I specified a timeout, and then would die at that timeout until i got it very large. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Tools@willy

On 16/07/2019 16:31, Kacper Wirski via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I have an issue as stated in topic. My samba 4.8.3 file server, which is AD > member frequently shows winbind errors (pasted below). From user > perspective it seems to work fine, but I'm worried that I have something > misconfigured and in the long run, I might run into some errors. > > My AD DC are

...thing, but one of them is an actual machine and still has the same error.? The DC is very lightly loaded.? How would I debug what is causing this reduction in IO? I know that various errors in the Samba logs are not "issues" but this one seems to be an issue.? I don't like seeing IO_TIMEOUTs. Another distracting error in the log included: [2020/10/11 22:43:29.843630,? 1, pid=969, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../../source3/libads/ldap.c:565(ads_find_dc) ? ads_find_dc: name resolution for realm 'AD.EECS.YORKU.CA' (domain 'EECSYORKUCA') failed: NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERV...

Hello, I have an issue as stated in topic. My samba 4.8.3 file server, which is AD member frequently shows winbind errors (pasted below). From user perspective it seems to work fine, but I'm worried that I have something misconfigured and in the long run, I might run into some errors. My AD DC are running on samba 4.9.x (two of them), compiled from source with BIND as DNS backend (running on

...is very lightly loaded. How would I debug >> what is causing this reduction in IO? I would be checked your network connections etc. >> >> I know that various errors in the Samba logs are not "issues" but >> this one seems to be an issue.? I don't like seeing IO_TIMEOUTs. >> >> Another distracting error in the log included: >> >> [2020/10/11 22:43:29.843630,? 1, pid=969, effective(0, 0), real(0, >> 0)] ../../source3/libads/ldap.c:565(ads_find_dc) >> ? ads_find_dc: name resolution for realm 'AD.EECS.YORKU.CA' (domain &gt...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2654 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-04-27 02:21 ------- The generator's setting of the ignore_timeout

I should have specified what i was replying to. This section seemed to be in reference to what I had experienced before. " > Well, I'm stumped too. (Although I thought I'd read that the > default timeout was not infinite when not otherwise specified, > but I've got so much going on right now that I could easily be > confused on that one!) > " Tim Conway

...is an actual machine and still has > the same error.? The DC is very lightly loaded.? How would I debug > what is causing this reduction in IO? > > I know that various errors in the Samba logs are not "issues" but this > one seems to be an issue.? I don't like seeing IO_TIMEOUTs. > > Another distracting error in the log included: > > [2020/10/11 22:43:29.843630,? 1, pid=969, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] > ../../source3/libads/ldap.c:565(ads_find_dc) > ? ads_find_dc: name resolution for realm 'AD.EECS.YORKU.CA' (domain > 'EECSYORKUCA')...

I have Samba4 running, and it had a win2k3 server joined to it. This is working great. I'd like to add another Ubuntu 12.04 server with samba4 beta5. What's the best join method? Do I provision the server as a member, then join using samba-tools domain join <domain> When I do it looks like it doesn't replicate the directory, just forwards? Should I provision as a DC with

Hello, I configured libvirtd with the sanlock lock manager plugin: # rpm -qa | egrep "libvirt-0|sanlock-[01]" libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.4-23.el6_2.4.x86_64 sanlock-1.8-2.el6.x86_64 libvirt-0.9.4-23.el6_2.4.x86_64 # egrep -v "^#|^$" /etc/libvirt/qemu-sanlock.conf auto_disk_leases = 1 disk_lease_dir = "/var/lib/libvirt/sanlock" host_id = 4 # mount | grep sanlock

Hi, I have question about the behavior of --backup-dir with --delete-after option. In my testing with version 2.6.4, it appears that the backup option only backups altered files. Files that will be deleted on the destination system will NOT be placed in --backup-dir location. I would like to back up deleted files. Is there a way to do this? Thanks

There's a rather old bug report in Debian's bug tracking system (see http://bugs.debian.org/27126) about wanting to be able to specify the maximum file size, as well as the minimum file size. Here's the text: Sometimes, it's useful to specify a file size range one is interested in. For example, I'd like to keep an up-to-date mirror of Debian, but I currently

I've been working on a Samba AD setup with a bunch of test machines - the one DC, and a bunch of clients.? Last night, I ended up switching the name of the test machines temporarily (except the DC), and re-joining the domain (that's for another e-mail later).? When things didn't work the way I had planned,? I switched the hostnames back, and re-joined the domain today on all the

I have attached a patch that supports a new "--direct-write" option. The result of using this option is to write directly to the destination files, instead of a temporary file first. The reason this patch is needed is for rsyncing to a device where the device is full or nearly full. Say that I am writing to a device that has 1 Meg free, and a 2 meg file on that device is out of date.

In some filesystems, typically optimized for large I/O throughputs (like IBM GPFS, IBM SAN FS, or distributed filesystems in general) a lot of lseek() operations can strongly impact on performances. In this cases it can be helpful to enlarge the block size used to handle sparse files directly from a command line parameter. For example, using a sparse write size of 32KB, I've been able to

Hi all. I have just finished a small patch that adds support for multiple --compare-dest or --link-dest args. Its primary usage is to do incremental backups on top of eachother. (My current backup system stores each incremental as a single diff of the latest full.) Example: First full backup: rsync -a somedir full-20040415/ First incremental: rsync -a --compare-dest=../full-20040415 \