Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "io_reparse_tag_symlink".
2015 Jan 23
4
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
...y this still does not work for me - can you really make a
> > symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does
> > "smbstatus" really show smb2/3 connection?
>
> No you can't - the protocol doesn't support it.
iirc it does, with an IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK ioctl. We just don't
implement it (yet). :)
-Ralph
--
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 G?ttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG G?ttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de,mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
2015 Jan 26
2
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
...t; > > > symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does
> > > > "smbstatus" really show smb2/3 connection?
> > >
> > > No you can't - the protocol doesn't support it.
> >
> > iirc it does, with an IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK ioctl. We just don't
> > implement it (yet). :)
>
> I meant (as I'm sure you know :-) that there's no "POSIX
> extensions" defined for SMB2 :-).
>
> We don't do *any* of the reparse point stuff yet (no demand
> as I recall it's Admin only on W...
2015 Jan 23
2
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
...>> symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does
> >>> "smbstatus" really show smb2/3 connection?
> >> No you can't - the protocol doesn't support it.
> Oh - that makes me really sad :-(
> > iirc it does, with an IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK ioctl. We just don't
> > implement it (yet). :)
> So in essence this means: Stay at NT1 if you need symlinks? (And wait
> until "IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK" is implemented?)
>
> Just that you know: I'm trying to have home shares on the network, and
> sometimes us...
2015 Jan 23
0
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
...u really make a
>>> symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does
>>> "smbstatus" really show smb2/3 connection?
>> No you can't - the protocol doesn't support it.
Oh - that makes me really sad :-(
> iirc it does, with an IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK ioctl. We just don't
> implement it (yet). :)
So in essence this means: Stay at NT1 if you need symlinks? (And wait
until "IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK" is implemented?)
Just that you know: I'm trying to have home shares on the network, and
sometimes users need symlinks (in some osx...
2015 Jan 23
0
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
...olic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does
>>>>> "smbstatus" really show smb2/3 connection?
>>>> No you can't - the protocol doesn't support it.
>> Oh - that makes me really sad :-(
>>> iirc it does, with an IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK ioctl. We just don't
>>> implement it (yet). :)
>> So in essence this means: Stay at NT1 if you need symlinks? (And wait
>> until "IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK" is implemented?)
>>
>> Just that you know: I'm trying to have home shares on the network, and...
2015 Jan 26
0
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
...c link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does
> > > > > "smbstatus" really show smb2/3 connection?
> > > >
> > > > No you can't - the protocol doesn't support it.
> > >
> > > iirc it does, with an IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK ioctl. We just don't
> > > implement it (yet). :)
> >
> > I meant (as I'm sure you know :-) that there's no "POSIX
> > extensions" defined for SMB2 :-).
> >
> > We don't do *any* of the reparse point stuff yet (no demand
> > a...
2015 Jan 23
2
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright.
>
> Following the smb.conf man page, I use:
>
> unix extensions = no
> wide links = yes
>
>
Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a
symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does