search for: io_bitmap_offset

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "io_bitmap_offset".

2013 Oct 31
1
[PATCH 2/3] x86: tss: Eliminate fragile calculation of TSS segment limit
...t limit, > duplicating the quirky details of the I/O bitmap array length, and > requiring a complex comment to explain. Replace that calculation with a > simpler one based on the offsetof the "stack" field that follows the > array. > > That then removes the last use of IO_BITMAP_OFFSET, so delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 11 +---------- > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/a...
2013 Oct 31
1
[PATCH 2/3] x86: tss: Eliminate fragile calculation of TSS segment limit
...t limit, > duplicating the quirky details of the I/O bitmap array length, and > requiring a complex comment to explain. Replace that calculation with a > simpler one based on the offsetof the "stack" field that follows the > array. > > That then removes the last use of IO_BITMAP_OFFSET, so delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 11 +---------- > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/a...
2013 Oct 22
0
[PATCH 2/3] x86: tss: Eliminate fragile calculation of TSS segment limit
...calculation of the TSS segment limit, duplicating the quirky details of the I/O bitmap array length, and requiring a complex comment to explain. Replace that calculation with a simpler one based on the offsetof the "stack" field that follows the array. That then removes the last use of IO_BITMAP_OFFSET, so delete it. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 11 +---------- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h...
2014 Mar 11
0
[PATCHv2 2/3] x86: tss: Eliminate fragile calculation of TSS segment limit
...calculation of the TSS segment limit, duplicating the quirky details of the I/O bitmap array length, and requiring a complex comment to explain. Replace that calculation with a simpler one based on the offsetof the "stack" field that follows the array. That then removes the last use of IO_BITMAP_OFFSET, so delete it. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> Acked-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum at fastmail.fm> --- v2: Rebased. Added a comment explaining the -1 in the calculation. arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 11 +---------- arch/x86/include/asm/processor....
2013 Oct 30
3
[PATCH 2/3] x86: tss: Eliminate fragile calculation of TSS segment limit
...nt limit, > duplicating the quirky details of the I/O bitmap array length, and > requiring a complex comment to explain. Replace that calculation with a > simpler one based on the offsetof the "stack" field that follows the > array. > > That then removes the last use of IO_BITMAP_OFFSET, so delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 11 +---------- > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm...
2013 Oct 30
3
[PATCH 2/3] x86: tss: Eliminate fragile calculation of TSS segment limit
...nt limit, > duplicating the quirky details of the I/O bitmap array length, and > requiring a complex comment to explain. Replace that calculation with a > simpler one based on the offsetof the "stack" field that follows the > array. > > That then removes the last use of IO_BITMAP_OFFSET, so delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 11 +---------- > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm...
2007 Dec 13
2
[PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss
...if } @@ -190,7 +169,7 @@ static inline void __set_tss_desc(unsigned cpu, unsigned int entry, void *addr) * -1? seg base+limit should be pointing to the address of the * last valid byte */ - pack_tss(&tss, (unsigned long)addr, + set_tssldt_descriptor(&tss, (unsigned long)addr, IO_BITMAP_OFFSET + IO_BITMAP_BYTES + sizeof(unsigned long) - 1, DESC_TSS); write_gdt_entry(d, entry, &tss, DESC_TSS); @@ -206,8 +185,8 @@ static inline void native_set_ldt(const void *addr, unsigned int entries) unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id(); ldt_desc ldt; - pack_ldt(&ldt, (unsigned long)a...
2007 Dec 13
2
[PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss
...if } @@ -190,7 +169,7 @@ static inline void __set_tss_desc(unsigned cpu, unsigned int entry, void *addr) * -1? seg base+limit should be pointing to the address of the * last valid byte */ - pack_tss(&tss, (unsigned long)addr, + set_tssldt_descriptor(&tss, (unsigned long)addr, IO_BITMAP_OFFSET + IO_BITMAP_BYTES + sizeof(unsigned long) - 1, DESC_TSS); write_gdt_entry(d, entry, &tss, DESC_TSS); @@ -206,8 +185,8 @@ static inline void native_set_ldt(const void *addr, unsigned int entries) unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id(); ldt_desc ldt; - pack_ldt(&ldt, (unsigned long)a...
2013 Oct 22
9
[PATCH 0/3] x86: Support compiling out userspace I/O (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the iopl and ioperm system calls, which allow privileged processes to request permission to directly poke I/O ports from userspace. Nothing on a modern Linux system uses these calls anymore, and anything new should be using /dev/port instead, or better yet writing a driver. Copying the bloat-o-meter stats from the final patch: 32-bit
2013 Oct 22
9
[PATCH 0/3] x86: Support compiling out userspace I/O (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the iopl and ioperm system calls, which allow privileged processes to request permission to directly poke I/O ports from userspace. Nothing on a modern Linux system uses these calls anymore, and anything new should be using /dev/port instead, or better yet writing a driver. Copying the bloat-o-meter stats from the final patch: 32-bit
2014 Mar 11
2
[PATCHv2 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a static inline in a common header. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
2014 Mar 11
2
[PATCHv2 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a static inline in a common header. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2014 Nov 02
12
[PATCH v4 00/10] x86: Support compiling out userspace IO (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the userspace IO system calls, iopl and ioperm. The first patch does some 32/64 unification in copy_thread to make subsequent changes easier. The second patch simplifies the complex calculation of the TSS segment limit, which also makes it easier to change in the last patch. Patches 3-9 introduce helpers to make it easier to compile out IO.
2014 Nov 02
12
[PATCH v4 00/10] x86: Support compiling out userspace IO (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the userspace IO system calls, iopl and ioperm. The first patch does some 32/64 unification in copy_thread to make subsequent changes easier. The second patch simplifies the complex calculation of the TSS segment limit, which also makes it easier to change in the last patch. Patches 3-9 introduce helpers to make it easier to compile out IO.
2014 Oct 29
4
[PATCH v3 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a static inline in a common header. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
2014 Oct 29
4
[PATCH v3 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a static inline in a common header. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett