search for: invts

I posted the message below, on the gmane.network.samba.general newsgroup some days ago, and haven't got any replies yet. If anyone has any suggestions as to what can be done, please let me know. I have been trying to use Samba 2.2.6 to print from two SCO Openserver 5.0.7 servers (VDOHOM & VDOHOM2, IP addresses 192.168.1.121 & 192.168.1.122) on a WAN consisting of networks

> Dear All > > I have data as follows. > > D T M L > 0.20 1 03 141 > 0.32 1 07 62 > 0.50 1 05 49 > 0.80 1 04 46 > 0.20 2 14 130 > 0.32 2 17 52 > 0.50 2 13 41 > 0.80 2 14 36 > 0.20 3 24 120 > 0.32

I posted the message below, some time ago, and haven't got any suggestions yet. I would be most grateful if anyone could tell me how I can increase the timeout period for setting up NETBIOS Sessions for smbclient, as this would perhaps solve the problem. By the way, there is no problem when printing from any Windows machine. PREVIOUS MESSAGE FOLLOWS I have been trying to use Samba 2.2.6

Hi, I am trying to dial a registered user via his IP:Port mechanism, but problem is that the audio data is not reaching to dialed user. here is the scenario. caller and callee both are registered at asterisk server. asterisk server is on public ip so no port forwarding and natting necessary there. however caller and callee both are behind router and there is port forwarding enabled and nat=yes,

Hello, with the last update for virt-manager I have a Problem with my CPU (XEON- SandyBridge) I have to disable the CPU Flag "invts", afterward I can install a KVM Guest! Now with the coming upgrade to centos 7.1 in the virt-manager the CPU Flag config is missing and I can't install a KVM Guest anymore :-(. Is this a know BUG? -- mit freundlichen Gr??en / best Regards, G?nther J. Niederwimmer

Hi C F no asterisk and sip device are not behind same router. actually both are in different countries. how ever when caller and callee are behind same routers voice is just fine (both ways) and i can see re-INVITEs too. but when someone calls from another router then this issue arises. caller can hear the called party but called party can not hear caller. and there are no re-invites issued

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? > I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would > mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction > and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you > anticipating something more

On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman > <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector >> >> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from >> >> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: >> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? >> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would >> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction