Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "invriant".
Did you mean:
invariant
2011 Dec 05
1
explanation why RandomForest don't require a transformations (e.g. logarithmic) of variables
Dear Researches,
sorry for the easy and common question. I am trying to justify the idea of
RandomForest don't require a transformations (e.g. logarithmic) of
variables, comparing this non parametrics method with e.g. the linear
regressions. In leteruature to study my phenomena i need to apply a
logarithmic trasformation to describe my model, but i found RF don't
required this approach.