search for: invol

Hi I have a strange problem maybe someone have similar experience? I have a simple ruby program that grabs some datat from database and displays it in browser. It displays a column of number and gives a total at the bottom. For some reason when viewing the page in browser it cuts off about have the table and gives no total. And even some of the data in the table is wrong like instead of

...around the corner, I thought it might be a good idea > > to give a little status update on the features that the desktop team has > > been working on for F8: > > what happend to compiz-fusion? I've been punting this issue for a while; sorry about that, I should have been more involed in the debate there. I have two concerns about the proposed updates: 1) I'd rather not ship a git snap shot for fedora 8. If we know that there's a stable release on the horizon, that is, coming out withing the next 1 or 2 months, we can do an update, but if there's no expectation...

...o be… IPv6 Disabling IPv6 on the network interface solves the problem, enabling it triggers it. I guess this is because IPv6 autoconfiguration is immediate (no need to get DHCP ack) while IPv4 needs to wait for DHCP process to finish, below is what I guess happens: Standard PC [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] IPv6 ready => network available [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] IPv4 DHCP ACK => IPv4 available [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] GPO processing SSD PC [some bot stuff invol… finished] GPO processing waits for network IPv6 ready => network available GP...

Some people asked about getting involved with vhost. Here's a short list of projects. vhost-net driver projects - profiling would be very helpful, I have not done any yet - tap support - working on it now - merged buffers - working on it now - scalability/fairness for large # of guests - working on it now - logging support with d...

Some people asked about getting involved with vhost. Here's a short list of projects. vhost-net driver projects - profiling would be very helpful, I have not done any yet - tap support - working on it now - merged buffers - working on it now - scalability/fairness for large # of guests - working on it now - logging support with d...

...the problem, enabling it >> triggers it. >> >> I guess this is because IPv6 autoconfiguration is immediate (no need to >> get DHCP ack) while IPv4 needs to wait for DHCP process to finish, below is >> what I guess happens: >> Standard PC >> [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] >> IPv6 ready => network available >> [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] >> IPv4 DHCP ACK => IPv4 available >> [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] >> GPO processing >> >> SSD PC >> [some bot stuff invol… finished]...

Hi, By running some scripts on our target system for a while, I lost all means of access to the system. It seems that the kernel is crashed with the following error message: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)" Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 We are currently running Linux version

..."DXGrab", "Managed", "Desktop" did not help. I'd appreciate any help on debugging this problem. -Hilko -- "In this case the virus author chose to target Outlook probably because it gave him better reach. There isn't a security vulnerability in Outlook involed in this at all." -- Scott Culp, Microsoft security program manager about ILOVEYOU

...arget path>/disk1.img. I have two problems: 1)how to get an unique <iscsi target path>? On my phisical host it is mounted as a random uuid in the /media folder. 2)will migration work with a <file> instead of a <device> as hard disk field? If you have any better solution, even involing the change from iscsi to another technology, you are free to propose it to me. Sorry for bothering, Pasquale

...he network interface solves the problem, enabling it > triggers it. > > I guess this is because IPv6 autoconfiguration is immediate (no need to > get DHCP ack) while IPv4 needs to wait for DHCP process to finish, below is > what I guess happens: > Standard PC > [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] > IPv6 ready => network available > [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] > IPv4 DHCP ACK => IPv4 available > [Some boot stuff involving slow disk I/O] > GPO processing > > SSD PC > [some bot stuff invol… finished] > GPO processing waits for n...

Hi All, I find that I am able to attach a disk device do a Xen domain, using virDomainAttachDevice(), running as a non-root user, but I am unable to use virDomainDetachDevice() - it results in an "unknown failure". Using "virsh [attach|detach]-device" exhibits this behviour. $ virsh attach-device domu1 attach.xml Device attached successfully $ virsh detach-device domu1

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017, at 07:34 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 3:10 AM SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev > < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > One of my Julia programs failed to execute with the following error, > > DICompileUnit not listed in llvm.dbg.cu > > !11 = distinct

Hi all, Is it possible to specify an arbitrary unix directory to be mounted from samba? For example, to mount /usr/local/bin ? Using a different smb server, I've seen the ability to do this by doing something like Connect to: \\smbserver\/usr/local/bin Connect as: user Password: **** In other words, I'd like to be able to specify the exact path I'd like to mount without having

Hello, Jonathan > I thought I'd messed up something related to the linker, > but I couldn't explain why XP would work using the same steps. The only thing comes to my mind seeing this: perl from msysDTK works differently (somehow) on Vista, thus llvm-config is broken which leads to missed libraries, broken dependencies, etc. I'd suggest you to compare stuff on different

Hello everyone, I am trying to chainload grub2 using both pxechain.com and pxechn.c32 and in both cases once grub2 loads it fails to find the grub config file on the server. My setup is as follows: 1. DHCP (192.168.1.2) server points to a multi pxe server menu on itself. The entry in the dhcp config file is: *class "installerator-pxeclients" { match if substring (option

In short: Perhaps we should switch lld to the bfd-style tombstoning behavior for a release or two, letting users opt-in to testing with the new -1/-2 tombstoning in the interim, before switching to the new tombstone by default (while still having the flag to switch back when users find surprise places that can't handle the new behavior). In long: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81784 and follow-on

Ok based on the MS link. Have you enabled under Computer Configuration in the navigation tree on the left side, navigate to Administrative Templates\System\Logon Enable "Always wait for the network at computer startup and logon" If not done yet. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sébastien Le Ray

...is a way to make that decision in the compiler >.> >driver+linker, then we'd have a question of "default new behavior except >> >when tuning for LLDB and GDB" or "default bfd behavior except when tuning >> >for SCE". >> >> I've been involed in another thread on SHF_LINK_ORDER ( https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020- >July/112415.html ). >> We may need a way to tell codegen about the used linker. >> >> pcc proposed -mbinutils-version= - This is nice in that some MC >> decisions related to -fno-inte...

...much of it happens is valuable too. >> >> I agree. Reducing the impact on customers is important. >> Though in this case, as you said, it would be done anyway(sooner or later). >> Finally, I do not know what is more important: a) get feedback faster with >> the cost of involved users and requiring them to make efforts >> to figure out the problem. or b) test with a smaller set of users, >> find more problematic cases, make new tombstone value to be default later. >> I am kind of preferring a). But, b) is more safe and is OK. >> >> >>...

...n, sooner or >later. But reducing how much of it happens is valuable too. I agree. Reducing the impact on customers is important. Though in this case, as you said, it would be done anyway(sooner or later). Finally, I do not know what is more important: a) get feedback faster with the cost of involved users and requiring them to make efforts to figure out the problem. or b) test with a smaller set of users, find more problematic cases, make new tombstone value to be default later. I am kind of preferring a). But, b) is more safe and is OK. >> That makes transition more understandabl...