search for: invokers

I installed at least one gem since I thought I actually once was able to run ''rake appdoc'' command since there is an api for my models and the ez_where plugin that I installed earlier. I wanted to see the api for pdf-writer which is the gem that I installed most recently. (no, I haven''t given up the issue of ''looping'' that Kevin and some others replied

Hi everyone! Im trying to install mechanizer from http://github.com/tenderlove/mechanize. I`ve clone the project into /tmp folder. When I do rake inside the folder /tmp/mechanizer it gives me this error: mac159180:mechanize renatosis$ rake (in /private/tmp/mechanize) /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby -w -Ilib:bin:test:. -e ''require "rubygems";

Hi Reid, I've been working on the outlining code and have a prototype that produces what I want for a simple case. Now I'm thinking about the heuristics for recognizing the various logical pieces for C++ exception handling code and removing them once they’ve been cloned. I've been working from various comments you've made earlier in this thread, and I'd like to run something

anyone able to explain logic behind "rake spec" startup? i.e. the below steps & why things occur when they do Macintosh-2:myequity greg$ rake spec --trace (in /Users/greg/source/myequity) ** Invoke spec (first_time) ** Invoke db:test:prepare (first_time) ** Invoke db:abort_if_pending_migrations (first_time) ** Invoke environment (first_time) ** Execute environment ** Execute

Hello Folks, Invoker is a gem for managing processes in development environment. You can install the gem via: ~> gem install invoker And you can clone the code from: http://github.com/code-mancers/invoker After Installing gem, you need to create a configuration file: [rails] directory = /home/gnufied/god_particle command = zsh -c ''bundle exec rails s -p

On May 22, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > Should we document it then? Invokes are confusing enough without > relying on undocumented behavior:) It'd be good for someone actually familiar with invoke could comment on this. Specifically, in the following testcase, the return value of the invoke is used in the unwind destination, which is not reachable from the normal

I was thinking about this last night, and I came up with a third alternative which I think looks very promising. It’s basically a re-working of the previous alternative to use the landingpad concept rather than arbitrary fake logic, but it uses a single landing pad for the entire function that mimics the logic of the personality function to dispatch unwinding calls and catch handlers. I believe

Hi Renato, >>> 1. It eases the future elimination of invoke, or at least, the >>> treatment of current instruction-level exception (as in Java) in a >>> cleaner way. >> >> I don't see what is cleaner about it, except that it is overall at a higher >> level of abstraction (see above). > > If I got it right, his proposal had the unwind path

Hi, in r176827 the optimization that turns invokes with empty landing pads into plain calls was disabled for invocations of function with the "uwtable" attribute. But given this code: struct S { ~S() {}; }; void blackbox(); __attribute__((__noinline__)) void inner() { blackbox(); } int foo() { S s; inner(); return 0; } int bar() {

Here is an alternative proposal to Bill's. It is closer to what we already have (which can be seen as a good or a bad thing!), and is also closer to what gcc does. It is more incremental than Bill's and introduces fewer new concepts. Executive summary ----------------- Remove the personality and list of catches out of eh.selector and stick them directly on invoke instructions. The

Hi, I would like to use dtrace to observe some behaviour in my J2EE app running in JBoss. I start JBoss normally in a 1.6 VM. When I try to enable set the ExtendedDTraceProbes flag using jinfo, I get a thread dump in the JBoss console and the message: "Unable to open door: target process not responding or HotSpot VM not loaded" in the jinfo console. I have tried this with both

I recently needed the behavior of my object to change on subsequent method calls so I added the syntax above. Here''s the diff of changes I made: Index: test/mocha/expectation_test.rb =================================================================== --- test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (revision 854) +++ test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (working copy) @@ -95,6 +95,12 @@

Hello. I''m using RSpec with Watir to do some automated tests on IE. I''ve ran into problem, where I want to make a screenshot of a browser window when example fails. For that I made custom formatter where in extra_failure_content i''m invoking screenshot taking methods. Now, everything works like a charm, as long as I''m not using after :each. I remember that I

I''m just starting to try out wxruby. I downloaded the CVS and executed rake. I received the following error - SWIG Version 1.3.24 Copyright (c) 1995-1998 University of Utah and the Regents of the University of California Copyright (c) 1998-2004 University of Chicago Compiled with i386-redhat-linux-g++ [i386-redhat-linux-gnu] Please see http://www.swig.org for reporting bugs and further

Hi Mark, > You are confusing stopping the unwinding at *some* levels or at *all* > levels. > Eg. > invoke > call > call > invoke > call > call > unwind the dwarf unwinder only stops and runs user code at the invokes. It does restore registers and so forth at every stack frame. This is extra work done at unwind time that reduces the cost

Grr.. I'm pulling my hair out trying to get the Cisco AnyConnect client to work under 6.2 32-bit. Seems like there is always 1 thing preventing my from using the latest centos release as my sole workstation. It was actually working on a new install for about half a day. I rebooted and now it won't connect. If I boot another vm (ubuntu or oel 5.7) the same client works. Im using version

While improving ADCE, i notice that for declare i32 @strlen(i8*) readnone define i32 @test() { ; invoke of pure function should not be deleted! invoke i32 @strlen( i8* null ) readnone to label %Cont unwind label %Other ; <i32>:1 [#uses=0] Cont: ; preds = %0 ret i32 0 Other: ; preds = %0 %exn = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0

Hi! When I run test:units, rails complains about the tables already being present. They had to be present so I could run individual unit tests. So why doesn''t rails just drop the tables if they exist? Any ideas?? Jeroen debug oupt below: >rake test:units --trace (in ...) ** Invoke test:units (first_time) ** Invoke db:test:prepare (first_time) ** Invoke environment (first_time)

Hi, When I run rake, everything works fine but when I run rake test:units I get an error apparently while it''s trying to create db tables saying the table already exists. I ran rake with trace to see the differences. It appears that rake test:units does db:schema:load twice, maybe that is the problem? Anyone know why this might be? Output of trace below Rake ** Invoke default

On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Executive summary > ----------------- > > Remove the personality and list of catches out of eh.selector and stick them > directly on invoke instructions. > > The invoke instruction > ---------------------- > > The invoke instruction is modified by adding extra catch info to it: > > <result> = invoke