Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "invoke2".
Did you mean:
invoke
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] bridge at start up
...gt;
> > struct sk_buff {
> > int foo;
> > };
> >
> > int invoke(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *))
> > {
> > return okfn(skb);
> > }
> >
> > extern int test_func(struct sk_buff *);
> >
> > int invoke2(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > return test_func(skb);
> > }
> >
> > In the generated asm on sparc64, invoke2() gets a tail-call
> > whereas invoke() does not. Hmmm...
>
> Pasha (<snort2004@mail.ru>) is currently using a bridge-nf patch vs...
2007 Apr 18
3
[Bridge] Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:05:59 +0000
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 08:50 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's not really an oops, just a warning that stack space got quiet
> > tight.
> >
> > The problem seems to be that the br netfilter code is nesting far too
> > deeply and recursing several times. Looks like a design