search for: invocas

> Am 30.08.2018 um 17:24 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> Am 30.08.2018 um 06:37 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: >>> >>>> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >>>> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >>>> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics

Am 30.08.2018 um 06:37 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately! >> >> I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS). >> It was very robust until now

On 7/10/20 4:10 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > Thanks for the tool, I've created RPMs of it: > > http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/hexpeek/ The package generates a symlink /usr/bin/hexedit to /usr/bin/hexpeek, but this is in conflict with the package hexedit which is in base of Centos 7. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, mk at lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 hexpeek: a hex editor for huge files Occasionally I need to work with huge binary files. Over the years I've tried many different tools and never found one that was exactly what I wanted. In my experience most hex editors either (1) do not work well with 4GB+ files or (2) require the user to learn a curses interface and are not scriptable. So

I am making a new box to test with and was trying to install shorewall via rpm. So I download the shorewall 2.2.5 rpm and issue a rpm -ivh shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch.rpm. I then get an error: error: Failed dependencies: which is needed by shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch So as you can see there are no dependency issues. I thought I saw this on the mailing list a while ago but I just searched for it I did

After a fresh install, I noticed that shorewall 2.4.0 wasn''t starting automatically under FC4. The startup script installs properly from the rpm: /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall ... but the post install "/sbin/chkconfig --add shorewall" produces this in the runlevel symlink directories: /etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S-1shorewall /etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K-1shorewall /etc/rc.d/rc6.d/K-1shorewall

--On Friday, September 18, 2020 10:53 PM +0200 Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> wrote: > mdadm --remove /dev/md127 /dev/sdf1 > > and then the same with --add should hotremove and add dev device again. > > If it rebuilds fine it may again work for a long time. This worked like a charm. When I added it back, it told me it was "re-adding" the drive, so it

Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> > 2) some symlinks created by udev are just wrong and therefore very > dangerous to use: > scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0 -> ../../sda > scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part1 -> ../../sdb1 > scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part2 -> ../../sdb2 I think it maybe caused by sd driver asynchronous

Hi, > Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> >> 2) some symlinks created by udev are just wrong and therefore very >> dangerous to use: >> scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0 -> ../../sda >> scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part1 -> ../../sdb1 >> scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part2 -> ../../sdb2 > > I think it

Once upon a time, Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> said: > I'm a bit confused what you have here. Did you mix pseudo hardware RAID > (BIOS RAID 0) with software RAID here? Because /dev/md126 clearly is part > of a software RAID. IIRC the old dmraid support for motherboard RAID has been phased out, but mdraid has grown support for Intel (and maybe some other?) common

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14323 Bug ID: 14323 Summary: Defaults for --skip-compress are not working, everything is being compressed Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:18 PM Simon Matter via CentOS > <centos at centos.org> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:54 PM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Is there some way to see the RPM changelog entries for a prospective >> yum >> >> update? Ideally I'd like to see

In article <68ce2ebfe8545ef4eda869657c72b9be.squirrel at webmail.bi.invoca.ch>, Simon Matter via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:49 PM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On 1/6/2019 10:51 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > >> > the product does not support the latest CentOS Linux >

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.14 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.14 New Features: 1. Previously, when rate-limiting was specified in /etc/shorewall/policy (LIMIT:BURST column), any traffic which exceeded the specified rate was silently dropped. Now, if a log level is given in the entry (LEVEL column) then drops are logged

> Am 15.11.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> >> >> On 11/15/18 12:01 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:18 PM Simon Matter via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:54 PM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Is there some way to see the RPM changelog entries for a prospective yum > >> update? Ideally I'd like to see just the entries that are newer than the

I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are my options? Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). mdadm.conf: # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid10] md127 : active raid10 sdf1[2](F)

This is the first time I am using cyrus-imapd package. I am unable to retrieve messages (pop3). At first, I had not entered the cyrus-master in /etc/hosts.allow and was getting connection refused. After adding the entry I am able to connect to port 110 but for some reason the pop3 server is failing the password authentication (see below). With the same userid/passwd I am able to ssh into the

> On 2020-07-12 05:57, Mogens Kjaer wrote: >> On 7/10/20 4:10 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> Thanks for the tool, I've created RPMs of it: >>> >>> http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/hexpeek/ >> >> The package generates a symlink /usr/bin/hexedit to /usr/bin/hexpeek, >> but this is in conflict with the package hexedit which is in base

Thanks Simon, Of course we are not sure but we have a strong feeling : - We tried the restore in loop (14) and all worked fine when firewall is disabled.- We tried the restore several times but no more 2? succeed restore at a row when firewall is enabled. We also tried : - - iptables avec nftables en backend - - firewalld avec nftables en backend - - nft avec nftables en backend