search for: inviolate

Hello list, I want to authenticate (only authenticate) through active directory with PAM. I googled around and everything I found, wheter it is forum posts or howtos, it always talks about winbind and joining the linux machine to the windows domain. I do not which to do this, I only want to get PAM to authenticate with the AD and then everything else is local. Should I use pam_winbind ?

Hey all, Ok, so I've been having some trouble for a while with an EC2 instance running CentOS 5.11 with a disk volume reporting 100% usage. Root is on an EBS volume. So I've tried the whole 'du -sk | sort -nr | head -10' routine all around this volume getting rid of files. At first I was getting rid of about 50MB of files. Yet the volume remains at 100% capacity. Thinking

Dear JW, I spent hours checking and upgrading my hardware. There is nothing wrong with it. It is a 'mature' Pentium-II 400MHz system that has been running my servers WITHOUT ANY CRASHES for nearly 2 years now 24/7 Listen to me: "The crashes are dues to rsync" There is an IDENTICAL report from a totally different source at

On 2/27/2015 10:46 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > I'm at a loss to explain how I can delete 190MB worth of data, reboot the > instance and still be at 100% usage. 190MB is less than one percent of 9.9GB aka 9900MB BTW, for cases like this, I'd suggest using df -k or -m rather than -h to get more precise and consistent values. also note, Unix (and Linux) file systems usually have a

I'm a new guy for llvm. I'm doing a project in which some instructions should be moved from one block into another. Those instructions may be data-dependent. When I tried to delete them one by one, it cause the error message like, " use stuck around after a def is destroyed" even if I deleted the use befor the def. When I tried to add them to another block, errors occurred like

I set up a samba share on a fedora core 5 box. I am able to drag and drop files to it, but when I try to save from an app, I get a message saying disk is full. These are all XP home clients. When I tried to share from an XP pro client it worked. Any ideas on how to fix this? thanks, Josh.

Hey guys, Thanks for this response. I just wanted to get back to you to let you know how I was able to resolve this. And yeah I think it's more informative to use df -m or df -k, so I'll try to stick to that from now on. Especially when posting to the lists. But I took a look around on the disk and saw that the /var/ww and /usr/local directories were the biggest. So I just solved this

I have Samba PDC with an LDAP backend. I just realized that the users can reset their passwords to anything, a single character a space. Is there anyway to prevent this?

Hello all, Just curious if anyone else has a SAMBA server that is serving up AutoCad and ArcView files to users on Windows. We are utilizing a RAID 5 setup on dual 2.8 GHZ 4 GB RAM Intel Controller card (all latest firmware, BIOS etc...etc..) Only 4 users are accessing the server, but it seems after a few days the server starts to choke up, lock files, and it causes a hardware issue. (We

Am 07.07.2020 um 08:07 schrieb Mark Constable: > > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrading to > Ubuntu 20.04. Curious, what's the rationale behind that move? Is it because that old beast of Outlook does

On 10/27/2017 2:54 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > I do that with a number of packages that are either newer or simply not available in the various Centos repos. In many cases it's as easy as downloading a new tar source file and adding it to the existing source rpm, doing three seconds of editing on the spec file to account for the new update, and compiling the result. Sometimes it's

Dear Rails team, The handling of the recent vulnerability in Rails has proven somewhat problematic for us. We have recently adopted Rails as our web platform of choice; previously, we used J2EE. We love Rails. We hate J2EE. We don''t want to go back. It took a lot of effort and convincing to get the management teams of our various projects to sign off on the use of Rails. The