search for: invention

On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 18:51 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > I think we?ll figure out something new to do with computers tomorrow. Certainly by Friday at latest. You seem to forget. Computers were invented to perform repetitive tasks. Computer usage should be serving mankind - not making it more difficult for mankind. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

Hi all, I apologize for this off-topic question but I need your help -- I know there are lots of experts here. As a lover and student of statistics, I am thinking of building a tree of various branches of statistics and keeping track of the greatest historical inventions/discoveries in statistics and the latest development of each branch. The goal is to understand in what context did the great inventions come out and then try to follow the greatest minds in terms of creating future significant inventions/discoveries in the statistics field... This is the "lea...

I have an interesting task for my son's lacrosse team... it is the time-old telephone tree... I am pretty sure someone has already done this w/*, why re-invent the wheel?... a) coach calls in leaves a msg, others call in retrieve the msg b) coach calls in leaves a msg, kicks of a call to every parent plays msg c) coach calls in leaves a msg, kicks off a call to every parent, checks for

Is there a function in R for calculating empirical cumulative distribution functions, i.e. the inverse of the quantile function? Perhaps in some library? I''d hate to have to re-invent the wheel. David Edwards, Biostatistics, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark. DEd@novonordisk.com <mailto:DEd@novonordisk.com> Tlf: +45 44 42 62 35. Fax: +45 44 42 14 80 [[alternate HTML version

Hi, all! Anyone know an easy way to specify the following model. Panel dataset, with stock through time, by firm. I want to run a model of y on a bunch of explanatory variables, and one dummy for each firm, which is 1 for observations that come from firm i, and 0 everywhere else. I have over 200 firms (and a factor variable that contains a firm identifier). Any easy way of going about

I''m new to puppet and working my way through the documentation. I''m struggling with the puppet labs module repo. I''ve toyed with numerous automation and configuration methodologies over the decades. Perhaps I''m seeing puppet wrong, Compared with CFEngine there is a a lot I like, but I''m not sure why I''m still having to re-invent the

yah. iceS does that. in fact, i'm listening to all of my mp3's right now using less bandwidth than a 56k. (32kpbs) -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Goward Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:29 PM To: icecast@xiph.org Subject: [icecast] Hoping to not have to re-invent the wheel Anyone have a good way to knock my

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: >> And an official stat() implementation would be very useful. After >> inventing mine, I noticed rosh also invented its own... #include <sys/stat.h> int stat(const char *path, struct stat *buf); I invented my own in rosh after not having one in the libraries based on what I thought was the most

The standard chisq.test() and fisher.test() functions, when applied to two distributions (to determine whether the same underlying distribution applies to both) requires one to pre-bin the distributions. Is there a library function (either built-in or in a package) that acts more like the ks.test() function, in that one can simply pass the two distributions and have it do the necessary binning as

...particularly inventive ones in my opinion). That suggests to me that with a little thought it should be possible to generate the same results via a method that doesn't infringe one of the 4 specific claims listed above. To clarify, despite all the technical mumbling in the abstract the claimed invention does not appear to be a "format" as such, but a method of pulling "blocks" and a "header" out of an undefined format and generating "color pixels". Even the abstract claims all the presented examples of keywords, values and structure for s3tc are not the actu...

Hello! There is something I really don't get: As I ordered a PRI ISDN line in Germany with DID, I had not to pay anything for a "DID number block", now I'm trying to get a PRI ISDN in the U.S. (CA) and SBC wants to charge more than 200 USD/month for numbers. I mean, this has nothing to do with DID, where everything that comes after the "base number" will be

Anyone have a good way to knock my 160kbit mp3s down to 56k real time using *nix? Even if it is beta sorta working code, anyone have anything even close to fast enough to do this? matt --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only

...ld be ignored by MultiMarkdown (e.g. to allow raw LaTeX, etc). But some of the comments *are* being processed, which screws them up. Thanks for any insight, and ideas on how to fix this! Fletcher Penney -- Fletcher T. Penney fletcher at fletcherpenney.net Without question, the greatest invention in the history of mankind is beer. Oh, I grant you that the wheel was also a fine invention, but the wheel does not go nearly as well with pizza. - Dave Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2437...

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:37:12PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Details about this can be found here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/750770/ > > What's new in this version > ========================== > > There are three choices based on the discussion [1] in RFC v2: > > > #1. We expose a VFIO device, so we can reuse the VFIO container/group > > based

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:37:12PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Details about this can be found here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/750770/ > > What's new in this version > ========================== > > There are three choices based on the discussion [1] in RFC v2: > > > #1. We expose a VFIO device, so we can reuse the VFIO container/group > > based

> Sorry for coming to the discussion so late. I have a couple of questions/comments: Actually, you're note is timely, because I'm planning to send out a patch (as soon as I update LangRef and rerun tests) that supports safelen but *not* lexical dependences. I don't need the safelen for Julia, but having done the work and seeing that OpenMP needs it, feel that I should finish the

> If I understand correctly: > > %v1 = load i32, i32* %a > %v2 = load i32, i32* %b > %v3 = add i32 %v1, %v2 > store i32 %v3, i32* %c > > maps to (using invented mnemonics): > > ASSIGN R0, %a > ASSIGN R1, %b > ASSIGN R2, %c > ADD *R2, *R0, *R1 > > I.e. pattern > (store %c, (add (load %a), (load %b))) > becomes > (ADD (ASSIGN R2, %c), (ASSIGN

...n them because lit tests are unlikely to catch all issues from paragraphs (2) and (3) of the scope described. > > 3. TON labs can provide its crazy target or some lightweight version of it. From the testing point of view, it works similar to the second solution, but it doesn't require any inventions. I could create a separate RFC about the target to find out if the community thinks it's appropriate. > > I'm not great at history, are there any historically iconic targets > that aren't 8-bit but are otherwise sane? I'd prefer to spend the > project's resources s...

It seems people are reinventing the wheel here: The goal is to generate all combinations of 1:n of size k. This (typically) results in a matrix of size k * choose(n,k) i.e. needs O(n ^ k) space, hence is only applicable to relatively small k. Then alternatives have been devised to generate the combinations "one by one", and I think I remember there has been a quiz/challenge about 20

I was under the impression his answer was correct from your reply, no? On Oct 17, 2016 17:45, "Alex Bradley via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Gentle Ping !! > > I would appreciate any help on this. I want to generate following as > described by Krzysztof : > > %v1 = load i32, i32* %a > %v2 = load i32, i32* %b > %v3 = add i32 %v1, %v2 >