search for: invente

On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 18:51 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > I think we?ll figure out something new to do with computers tomorrow. Certainly by Friday at latest. You seem to forget. Computers were invented to perform repetitive tasks. Computer usage should be serving mankind - not making it more difficult for mankind. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

Hi all, I apologize for this off-topic question but I need your help -- I know there are lots of experts here. As a lover and student of statistics, I am thinking of building a tree of various branches of statistics and keeping track of the greatest historical inventions/discoveries in statistics and the latest development of each branch. The goal is to understand in what context did the great

I have an interesting task for my son's lacrosse team... it is the time-old telephone tree... I am pretty sure someone has already done this w/*, why re-invent the wheel?... a) coach calls in leaves a msg, others call in retrieve the msg b) coach calls in leaves a msg, kicks of a call to every parent plays msg c) coach calls in leaves a msg, kicks off a call to every parent, checks for

Is there a function in R for calculating empirical cumulative distribution functions, i.e. the inverse of the quantile function? Perhaps in some library? I''d hate to have to re-invent the wheel. David Edwards, Biostatistics, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark. DEd@novonordisk.com <mailto:DEd@novonordisk.com> Tlf: +45 44 42 62 35. Fax: +45 44 42 14 80 [[alternate HTML version

...ms. This is generally called a "fixed effects" model, although it seems like the term "fixed effects" is being used somewhat differently in the context of the nlme package. Toby -- ************************************************************************** When Thomas Edison invented the light bulb he tried over 2000 experiments before he got it to work. A young reporter asked him how it felt to have failed so many times. He said "I never failed once. I invented the light bulb. It just happened to be a 2000-step process."

I''m new to puppet and working my way through the documentation. I''m struggling with the puppet labs module repo. I''ve toyed with numerous automation and configuration methodologies over the decades. Perhaps I''m seeing puppet wrong, Compared with CFEngine there is a a lot I like, but I''m not sure why I''m still having to re-invent the

yah. iceS does that. in fact, i'm listening to all of my mp3's right now using less bandwidth than a 56k. (32kpbs) -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Goward Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:29 PM To: icecast@xiph.org Subject: [icecast] Hoping to not have to re-invent the wheel Anyone have a good way to knock my

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: >> And an official stat() implementation would be very useful. After >> inventing mine, I noticed rosh also invented its own... #include <sys/stat.h> int stat(const char *path, struct stat *buf); I invented my own in rosh after not having one in the libraries based on what I thought was the most reasonable use of existing functions. -- -Gene

...stical test? (Yes, you can accuse me of laziness: I just don't fancy trying to figure out a routine that would make sure that there more than 5 samples in each of the expected bins before applying the chi-squared test. It seems too much like re-inventing an elementary wheel that must have been invented by someone else.)

...rce-feed the raw bytes to hardware instead? Claim 22 seems like a pretty important step and possibly a hard one to workaround but it also appears to be claiming the invention of using a key lookup to fetch values with some vague notion of quantising them. Is it just me or are they claiming to have invented indexed color? PS. If some of the points above seem pedantic that's deliberate. My understanding is that patent claims are actually intended or required to be NARROW in scope as broad claims are usually rejected. That means a workaround that doesn't do PRECISELY the things in each claim a...

...DID number block", now I'm trying to get a PRI ISDN in the U.S. (CA) and SBC wants to charge more than 200 USD/month for numbers. I mean, this has nothing to do with DID, where everything that comes after the "base number" will be transmitted to the PBX anyway. Wasn't DID invented to get rid of number blocks? Please enlighten me. Thanks. Andi

Anyone have a good way to knock my 160kbit mp3s down to 56k real time using *nix? Even if it is beta sorta working code, anyone have anything even close to fast enough to do this? matt --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only

It appears that Markdown will process ampersands contained within HTML comments if that comment is part of a markdown paragraph, but will not when that paragraph is contained within an HTML block of it's own (and therefore ignored by Markdown.) For example: This is a markdown paragraph with a comment that *will* be processed <!-- This & *will* be converted -->

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:37:12PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Details about this can be found here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/750770/ > > What's new in this version > ========================== > > There are three choices based on the discussion [1] in RFC v2: > > > #1. We expose a VFIO device, so we can reuse the VFIO container/group > > based

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:37:12PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Details about this can be found here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/750770/ > > What's new in this version > ========================== > > There are three choices based on the discussion [1] in RFC v2: > > > #1. We expose a VFIO device, so we can reuse the VFIO container/group > > based

> Sorry for coming to the discussion so late. I have a couple of questions/comments: Actually, you're note is timely, because I'm planning to send out a patch (as soon as I update LangRef and rerun tests) that supports safelen but *not* lexical dependences. I don't need the safelen for Julia, but having done the work and seeing that OpenMP needs it, feel that I should finish the

> If I understand correctly: > > %v1 = load i32, i32* %a > %v2 = load i32, i32* %b > %v3 = add i32 %v1, %v2 > store i32 %v3, i32* %c > > maps to (using invented mnemonics): > > ASSIGN R0, %a > ASSIGN R1, %b > ASSIGN R2, %c > ADD *R2, *R0, *R1 > > I.e. pattern > (store %c, (add (load %a), (load %b))) > becomes > (ADD (ASSIGN R2, %c), (ASSIGN R0, %a), (ASSIGN R1, %b)) > Yes. Exactly. Regards, Alex -------------- next p...

...to find out if the community thinks it's appropriate. > > I'm not great at history, are there any historically iconic targets > that aren't 8-bit but are otherwise sane? I'd prefer to spend the > project's resources supporting something like that than either an > invented target or a speculative crypto-currency oddity. PDP10 is iconic enough? Joerg

...of Wageningen as "combinat" module. Later this became into an R package which is now maintained by Vince Carey. The source of 'combinat' still shows # DATE WRITTEN: 14 April 1994 LAST REVISED: 10 July 1995 # AUTHOR: Scott Chasalow OTOH, people have since reinvented the wheel quite prolifically: There's combinations() in gtools {based on Bill Venables' code from R News 1/1}, combs() in CAtools, subsets() in BHH2, and nchoosek() in vsn (bioconductor); then 'fwd.combn' in package "forward" which states explicitly that it is Scott's...

...lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Gentle Ping !! > > I would appreciate any help on this. I want to generate following as > described by Krzysztof : > > %v1 = load i32, i32* %a > %v2 = load i32, i32* %b > %v3 = add i32 %v1, %v2 > store i32 %v3, i32* %c > > maps to (using invented mnemonics): > > ASSIGN R0, %a > ASSIGN R1, %b > ASSIGN R2, %c > ADD *R2, *R0, *R1 > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Alex > > On 14 Oct 2016 1:00 p.m., "Alex Bradley" <alexbradley.bqc at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > If I understand...