Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "invenstigate".
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:59 -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable
> Scheme system (PLT Scheme). The original plan was to use GNU
> Lightning, but 1) it seems to be dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a
> huge amount of stuff that I would have had to write (poorly) from
> scratch.
Yay! A real
2005 May 05
3
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...en more information about the call tree is
> available, have several levels of optimizations, etc.
While this is extremely primative by modern JIT standards, it is
extremely good by modern Open Source standards, so I'm quite thankfull
for it.
If no one else does, this is something I'll invenstigate in the
future.
> > Does there happen to be a C interface to the jit ? Our scheme impl
> > has a good FFI, but it doesn't do C++. If not, this is no big deal,
> > and i'll just write something myself.
>
> No, but such bindings would be *very useful*. And since t...
2005 May 05
4
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
Hi List,
I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable
Scheme system (PLT Scheme). The original plan was to use GNU
Lightning, but 1) it seems to be dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a
huge amount of stuff that I would have had to write (poorly) from
scratch.
At the moment, LLVM seems to be the ideal choice for implementing the
Scheme JIT, but there are problems that need