Displaying 20 results from an estimated 321 matches for "invalue".
Did you mean:
intvalue
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
...ect
> your code that adds the attribute.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
no my fucntion is
void consume(int nb_into_bloc, int *nb_total)
the second is a pointer
here is how I pass the parameters
Instruction* ii = i->getTerminator();
const int n = cast <int> (i->size());
ConstantInt* inValue = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Context), n);
std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params;
int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);
int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y);
CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume,
int32_16_params.begin(), int32_16_params.end(), "", ii);
----...
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
I have defined the fucntion in another object file and linked it to the
in fact the fucntion is :
void consume(int , int * );
std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params;
int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);//inValue is ConstantInt* inValue
int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y);
CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume, int32_16_params.begin(),
int32_16_params.end(), "", ii);
compilation without errors
Now when i tried this pass an error says:
Wrong type for attribute noalias
t...
2011 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
...t;
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
>
> no my fucntion is
> void consume(int nb_into_bloc, int *nb_total)
> the second is a pointer
> here is how I pass the parameters
> Instruction* ii = i->getTerminator();
> const int n = cast <int> (i->size());
> ConstantInt* inValue = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Context), n);
> std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params;
> int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);
> int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y);
> CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume, int32_16_params.begin(),
> int32_16_params.end...
2006 Mar 22
6
Project management
Hello for all,
Anyone using any software for management your projects?
Thank''s
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2008 Apr 26
4
amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav
Hi List,
I've been working on documenting an amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav
installation for postfix on CentOS5 with regards to writing this up for
the Wiki (with invaluable help from forum member WhatsHisName - thanks!).
I hope to make a start on a Wiki page in the next week or so, so if
anyone has any experience with this combo and would like to offer
advice, tips and
2007 Dec 15
2
DNS broken for www.voip-info.org ??
The DNS for www.voip-info.org seems to be non-responsive. Is there a
mirror of this invaluable resource site?
Tx,
Steve
dig www.voip-info.org
;; Got SERVFAIL reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, trying next server
; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> www.voip-info.org
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 61402
;;
2015 Aug 29
4
please block user
In consequence of this thread I went looking for a probe script that
would send individualized email messages to each subscriber of a
mailman list and found none. Does such a thing in fact exist?
It seems to me that this would be an invaluable tool in tracking down
which subscriber is the bot-bait.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive
2011 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila,
> My problem is how to call a method
> suppose this fucntion
> void A(int x)
> {
> x=x+1;
>
> }
>
> should i define this function and declare it at the beginig of the module and
> create for it a basic bloc?
you can just declare the function (i.e. no need to give it a body), and call it.
You can then link with an object file that defines it. This is
2006 Jun 19
2
building a libR.a for BlueGene/L
We would like to compile a minimal R library that could be linked
into an application that will be run on a BlueGene/L system with
8,192 processors. This is a system that requires no shared libraries,
no graphical interface, must be single threaded, and will be cross-
compiled. I would statically link the code for the packages we require.
From looking through the code, it seems like it
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>
> Hi Nabila,
>
> > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc
>
> you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic
> block.
> However you can try to insert the call before the terminator.
>
Yes, i mean before the termininator,
My problem is how to call a method
suppose
2015 Jun 25
2
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:03:18 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, June 24, 2015 16:11, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>> >
>> > Is there an easy to follow "howto" for normal LVM administration
>> > tasks. I get tired of googling every-time I have to do something
>> > I don't remember
2008 Feb 06
11
Newbie Question: Can I setup mongrel as a proxy between a browser and the web?
I am trying to create a proxy which I can route my browser requests through
in order to gather information on the web page loading. At this time I am
particularly interested in the many GET requests associated with loading a
single web page. Note: This does not have anything to do with rails, my goal
is to run a ruby app in the background, set firefox to proxy all requests
through it, log those
2016 May 20
3
Ransomware?
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Helmut Hullen <Hullen at t-online.de> wrote:
> Hallo, ToddAndMargo,
>
> Du meintest am 15.05.16:
>
>> Is there anything in Samba that will help protect
>> against ransomware?
>
> The linux principle is "one job - one tool". Antivirus software exists.
> It doesn't help against really new malware, it doesn't
2015 Jun 25
6
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
On Wed, June 24, 2015 16:11, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>
> Is there an easy to follow "howto" for normal LVM administration
> tasks. I get tired of googling every-time I have to do something
> I don't remember how to do regarding LVM, so I usually just
> don't bother with it at all.
>
> I believe it has some benefit for my use cases, but I've been
>
2009 Jul 20
6
[patch 00/54] [Announce] Microsoft Hyper-V drivers for Linux
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce, that after many months of discussions, Microsoft
has released their Hyper-V Linux drivers under the GPLv2. Following
this message, will be the patches that add the drivers to the
drivers/staging/ tree, and a whole bunch of cleanups.
It's taken a long road to get here, and I'd like to thank the following
people who made this possible:
- Steve
2009 Jul 20
6
[patch 00/54] [Announce] Microsoft Hyper-V drivers for Linux
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce, that after many months of discussions, Microsoft
has released their Hyper-V Linux drivers under the GPLv2. Following
this message, will be the patches that add the drivers to the
drivers/staging/ tree, and a whole bunch of cleanups.
It's taken a long road to get here, and I'd like to thank the following
people who made this possible:
- Steve
2018 Jul 10
2
RMarkdown Vignettest in R packages with child is failing in package build
Dear List,
I am working on moving some Rmarkdown reports into the vignettes
folder of a package. While I was able to solve to problem of
parametrized reports in vignettes folder thanks to your invaluable
help (Thank you), I am now struggling with the following problem.
One of the reports which I am moving to vignettes includes the following code :
```{r}
child_docs <-
2009 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] Instruction Conversion
Hi,
Let say i am writing a code inside basic block pass and iterating all the
instructions inside,
and i encountered in this instruction :
%3 = add i32 %1, 2
I want to convert this instruction to something like this:
add R1, 2, R3
I know the opocode, but i what i need is, the operands %1 and 2 (in this
example).
I will be grateful if some one will tell me how to do so .
-------------- next
2009 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Instruction Conversion
Rotem Varon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let say i am writing a code inside basic block pass and iterating all
> the instructions inside,
> and i encountered in this instruction :
If you're asking how to get the operands of an Instruction, use the
getOperand() method:
Value * Operand1 = I->getOperand(0);
Value * Operand2 = I->getOperand(1);
The LLVM doxygen documentation
2009 Feb 11
0
[LLVMdev] Operand, instruction
Nipun Arora wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can one extract the operand of an instruction in an LLVM pass?
> Like I can get the opcode bt I'd like to get the operands as well
>
Use the getOperand() method of class Instruction (which I think is
inherited from Value or User or some other LLVM class). It takes a
single parameter that is an index specifying which operand to return.
The