search for: invalidinitializer

...s manually i could see that results produced are same as that of the reference output. When verbose mode is enabled i see that *.test.out files are not being produced. This is the file that gets compared with the reference file. FAIL: test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C/Regression-C-2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer.test (1 of 35) ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: SingleSource/Regression/C/Regression-C-2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer.test' FAILED ******************** /òpt/llvm-test/build/tools/timeit --limit-core 0 --limit-cpu 7200 --timeout 7200 --limit-file-size 104857600 --limit-rss-size 83886...

...ypeTest SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-VarSizeArray SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-08-BaseType SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-08-VirtualFunctions SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-13-Crasher SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-08-20-EnumSizeProblem SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-09-29-NonPODsByValue SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy SingleSource/Regression/C/200...

...Regression/C/sumarray | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-08-12-InlinerAndAllocas | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | *...

...0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion | 0.0059 524 0.0021 * 0.0017 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer | 0.0012 428 0.0014 * 0.0013 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError | 0.0015 428 0.0013 * 0.0013 | 0.00...

...0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion | 0.0040 524 0.0000 * 0.0040 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer | 0.0000 412 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError | 0.0000 412 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion | 0.0064 516 0.0014 * 0.0014 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer | 0.0089 424 0.0011 * 0.0059 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError | 0.0023 424 0.0069 * 0.0011 | 0.00...

...0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion | 0.0016 548 0.0009 * 0.0009 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer | 0.0006 448 0.0006 * 0.0007 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError | 0.0006 448 0.0006 * 0.0006 | 0.00...

...| -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23-TransparentUnion                    | > 0.0000 576      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.00 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer                  | > 0.0000 456      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError                       | > 0.0000 456      0.0100      *                0.0000...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-23- > TransparentUnion | 0.0000 576 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.00 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16- > InvalidInitializer | 0.0000 456 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16- > VolatileError | 0.0000 456 0.0100 > *...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...1 22509 2003-05-31-CastToBool.ll 7 6621 0 0.01 6612 0 0.01 6612 2003-05-31-LongShifts.ll 2 5739 0 0.01 5730 0 0.01 5730 2003-06-08-BaseType.ll 3 2098 0 0.01 2082 0 0.01 2082 2003-06-08-VirtualFunctions.ll 4 4118 0 0.01 4102 0 0.01 4102 2003-06-13-Crasher.ll 4 1886 0 0.01 1870 0 0.01 1870 2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer.ll 1 883 0 0.01 871 0 0.01 871 2003-06-16-VolatileError.ll 1 857 0 0.01 845 0 0.01 845 2003-07-06-IntOverflow.ll 5 6583 0 0.01 6574 0 0.01 7412 2003-07-08-BitOpsTest.ll 2 4018 0 0.01 4009 0 0.01 4009 2003-07-09-LoadShorts.ll 2 22686 0 0.01 22677 0 0.01 22677 2003-07-09-SignedArgs.ll 4 19145 0 0.01...