Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "intsrctyp".
Did you mean:
intsrctype
2009 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] Regular Expressions
...lass.
For example:
!subst(SRCTYPE,
!cast<ValueType>(!patsubst(".*ps$","v4f32",!patsubst(".*pd$","v2f64",OpcodeStr))),
To reduce redundancy, developers must be able to write generic patterns
like this:
[(set DSTREGCLASS:$dst, // rr, rrr
(xor (INTSRCTYPE (bitconvert (SRCTYPE SRCREGCLASS:$src1))),
(INTSRCTYPE (bitconvert (SRCTYPE SRCREGCLASS:$src2)))))],
The substitution then fills in the appropriate types, etc. based
on which variant (32-bit, 64-bit, AVX, etc.) is being produced.
I suppose you could argue that additional parameters specif...
2009 Jun 13
0
[LLVMdev] Regular Expressions
On Jun 11, 2009, at 2:01 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Thursday 11 June 2009 12:28, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes. I want TableGen to be able to infer lots of stuff
>>> programmatically.
>>> This helps tremendously when specifying things like, oh, AVX. :)
>>
>> I don't see how this relates to regex's, and really don't want to
2009 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] Regular Expressions
On Jun 15, 2009, at 11:33 AM, David Greene wrote:
> To reduce redundancy, developers must be able to write generic
> patterns
> like this:
>
> [(set DSTREGCLASS:$dst, // rr, rrr
> (xor (INTSRCTYPE (bitconvert (SRCTYPE SRCREGCLASS:$src1))),
> (INTSRCTYPE (bitconvert (SRCTYPE SRCREGCLASS:$src2)))))],
>
> The substitution then fills in the appropriate types, etc. based
> on which variant (32-bit, 64-bit, AVX, etc.) is being produced.
>
> I suppose you could argue that a...
2009 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Regular Expressions
On Thursday 11 June 2009 12:28, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 12:39 PM, David Greene wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 June 2009 14:34, Dan Gohman wrote:
> >> Can you describe what problem you're trying to solve here? Does it
> >> really need Regular Expressions?
> >
> > Yes. I want TableGen to be able to infer lots of stuff
> >