search for: intricates

Hi Kenneth, > Well...strictly as LLVM IR I find externally visible incorrect behavior > unlikely, it's just a "different definition". For C and C++, I'd be > looking at more complicated variations of > > int main() > { > volatile int i = 1; > return 0; > } > > It's clear that the LLVM IR representation of i cannot be simply >

I'm proposing that one of the esteemed members of the LLVM community present a talk on exception handling both how it is done inside LLVM and in general. The interest from my part is the Windows Exception Unwinding which from what I read is like Itaniums. It also looks like this is the one implemented in LLVM and most everyone cares about. I understand in the face of optimizations the

Hi Folks, I'm trying to find a neat solution to an apparently simple problem, but one which turns out to be a bit more intricate and tricky than one might expect. Suppose I have numbers given to a large number of digits. For example 1234567021 where (though I don't know this beforehand) only the last 3 digits will be varying (and all 3 will vary). What I want is, give a vector x of

Hello Richard, Haha, ok, here's a good one: I commented that if statement out at line 300, applied your patch (I see you updated the github of this code, perhaps that's the best place to grab the code from), and when I run virt-sysprep, I get the following parameter for my disk drive: >> qemu-system-x86_64: -drive

Hi, I have two small issues with my R code, no big deal but curiosity really. Here is a sample code, > > x <- rnorm(1:10) > > foo <- function(a = 1, b = list(x = c(1:10), y = c(1:10))){ > > for (ii in seq(along=b$y)){ > > print(x[ii] + b$x[ii]) > } > > > } > > foo() # default OK > > foo(b=list(x=1, y=c(1:10))) # only the first

Hi, On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:32:18 -0700 Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think David and I are probably the most familiar with how WinEH works in > LLVM, but I don't think either of us has time to prepare a talk for the dev > meeting. I'm trying to prepare a talk on supporting the MS debug info > format in LLVM this year. That said,

Hi Folks, Say I have 2 continuous variables X,Y. I can of course plot (X,Y) with plot(X,Y,pch="+",col="blue") say, and add the regression line from lm(Y~X) by extracting the coefficients 'a' of Intercept and 'b' of X from Y.lm <- lm(Y~X). Now, however, I want to have not only a general explanatory title such as main="Plot of Y against X"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So a friend of mine and I setup a static key based point to point OpenVPN connection from my box to his for the express intent of carrying IAX traffic encrypted. His network on his lan is 172.30.1.0/24 and mine is 10.0.30.0/24. His PBX is located at 172.30.1.48 and mine is at 10.0.30.2. We had an existing working IAX trunk in place prior to the VPN,

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:00:32 +0200 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Kenneth, > > > Well...strictly as LLVM IR I find externally visible incorrect > > behavior unlikely, it's just a "different definition". For C and > > C++, I'd be looking at more complicated variations of > > > > int main() > > { > >

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:25:54PM -0700, Jon wrote: > Hello Richard, > > Haha, ok, here's a good one: I commented that if statement out at line 300, > applied your patch (I see you updated the github of this code, perhaps > that's the best place to grab the code from), and when I run virt-sysprep, > I get the following parameter for my disk drive: > > >>

Hello all, This week I've tested out a few ways to do a P2V on a rather ancient CentOS 6 server, in order to move it to a Hyper-V host. So far my tests have failed rather spectacularly. Initially I was set on doing a simple dd-routine, but was told that the server cannot be taken off-line as it's being used daily, so had to look for other solutions. The disk setup is currently as

On 10/25/2010 7:33 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Oct 25, 2010, at 5:13 PMPDT, Kenneth Boyd wrote: >> On 10/25/2010 6:31 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: >>> Your objection is like saying that it isn't kosher to ignore the >>> "register" keyword, because >>> "I know what I am doing and you don't.....". >> What isn't kosher, is

Tim, yes, I am on a very unique architecture, just about every instruction has a signed and unsigned operation (ie, adds, addu, subs, subu, etc...) and we handle signed and unsigned somewhat differently. I'm not sure how we'll handle this yet, very worst case scenario is to propagate the info from clang but that's not ideal, obviously. Thanks for all the replies! On Wed, Feb 15,

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:58 PM Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > For what it is worth, I do believe that these files do really belong in > the libc project because they are so intricately tied to the implementation > of the language. I just think that the fact these files will be part of > the project is merely an implementation detail and should not even

Hello, * newbie here, I'm designing a setup that is to eventually be used in a production virtual PBX/VoIP service. Customers need to be able to change their setups over the web - I want them to be able to do simple things like setting up call forwarding, as well as more intricate stuff that will require me to re-generate their dialplans. Administration of the service is to be

On Oct 20, 2010, at 2:56 PM, roger roger wrote: > I notice that using the online demo, functions which return structures are converted to be void, and instead take an extra argument which is the a pointer to the returned structure, and the allocation is made by the caller. > Even declared, but undefined functions are converted like this, presumably this doesn't cause a problem during

I think David and I are probably the most familiar with how WinEH works in LLVM, but I don't think either of us has time to prepare a talk for the dev meeting. I'm trying to prepare a talk on supporting the MS debug info format in LLVM this year. That said, I'll definitely have time to answer questions in person. It might be worth setting up a BoF to schedule some time We gave a 30m

On 11/03/2017 06:09 AM, hw wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This week I've tested out a few ways to do a P2V on a rather ancient CentOS >> 6 server, in order to move it to a Hyper-V host. >> >> So far my tests have failed rather spectacularly. >> Initially I was set on doing a simple dd-routine, but was told that the >> server

On Oct 25, 2010, at 5:13 PMPDT, Kenneth Boyd wrote: > On 10/25/2010 6:31 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: >> >> Your objection is like saying that it isn't kosher to ignore the >> "register" keyword, because >> "I know what I am doing and you don't.....". > What isn't kosher, is making side effects disappear from a C program. > >

I concur with Avraham that capabilities need to be ensured e.g., in recommended packages. I should have mentioned that. My concern is that the core should be focused on the programming language aspects. The computational math and some of the more intricate data management could better be handled by folk outside the core. JN On 2019-03-04 9:12 a.m., Avraham Adler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019